TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Show HN: Check if a scientific paper has been supported or contradicted

5 点作者 bananaoomarang大约 6 年前

1 comment

Nadya大约 6 年前
The guidelines linked to in your Terms of Service fails to load &#x2F; doesn&#x27;t exist: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;scite.ai&#x2F;guidelines" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;scite.ai&#x2F;guidelines</a> You also may want to update your error message as it reports the Nginx version and Operating System being used.<p>How are &quot;experts&quot; classified? People misread studies all the time so trusting users to classify if a study supports or contradicts another study gives me even less faith than the text analysis method. Also as a suggestion, have the &quot;Example Report&quot; link to a random report or several different studies.<p>The presentation of this is really clean and it seems like an amazingly useful tool - as long as classifications remain accurate (even just the &quot;mentioning&quot; metric is extremely useful!)<p>I&#x27;m looking forward to opportunities to use the site more, this is totally something I am willing to get behind and support. Not sure how I feel about the indemnity clause, however unlikely it is to ever come up. Not even sure if it would be upheld by courts but I dislike how common it is to see nowadays.