TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Group f/64

71 点作者 steven741大约 6 年前

5 条评论

Mankaninen大约 6 年前
While f/64 sounds like a small aperture, it can be worth remembering that it was on large format cameras. A small sensor like on iPhone 6 is wide open corresponding to depth matching f/113! (iPhone6 is f/2.2, crop is 7.21, 8"x10" camera is crop 0.14. 7.21/0.14*2.2 = f/113)
评论 #19820121 未加载
评论 #19823705 未加载
monort大约 6 年前
Even though pictorialists faded into obscurity, they still won over f/64. Modern photography is absolutely not realistic.
评论 #19817757 未加载
评论 #19818969 未加载
评论 #19821496 未加载
w0mbat大约 6 年前
ƒ/64 may give the maximum depth of field (if that's your smallest stop), but due to diffraction you generally get higher image quality at ƒ/8 or ƒ/11.
评论 #19826840 未加载
评论 #19824732 未加载
评论 #19826024 未加载
kazinator大约 6 年前
Ironically, an ultra high depth-of-field isn&#x27;t realistic.<p>In computer graphics, simulating low depth of field (background and foreground blurred, while subject in focus) is a considered an advancement in realism.
评论 #19823391 未加载
评论 #19826988 未加载
评论 #19826044 未加载
评论 #19821891 未加载
Invictus0大约 6 年前
This might be a bit pedantic but can the mods please retitle this to a lowercase f?
评论 #19818040 未加载
评论 #19820130 未加载