Every time TimescaleDB is brought up, I feel the need to point people to their shadily worded proprietary licence[0], and pg_partman[1].<p>Do the same benchmarks against a pg_partman managed partitioned db and you'll get the exact same performance. We do, at least - 150k or so metrics per second, 10 columns per metric.<p>Not trying to crap on the TimescaleDB guys, I've found a lot of their writeups extremely useful and can totally see how their commercially supported product fits. However, I like to see pg_partman at least mentioned somewhere in the article/comments. It's awesome and does the same job.<p>[0]<a href="https://github.com/timescale/timescaledb/blob/master/LICENSE" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/timescale/timescaledb/blob/master/LICENSE</a><p>[1]<a href="https://github.com/pgpartman/pg_partman" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/pgpartman/pg_partman</a>