TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How Plaid Reconciles Pending and Posted Transactions

127 点作者 bjacokes将近 6 年前

3 条评论

jaden将近 6 年前
It&#x27;s encouraging to see Plaid making this level of effort to be accurate. It seems like it could be a viable alternative to Mint using something like <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;yyx990803&#x2F;build-your-own-mint" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;yyx990803&#x2F;build-your-own-mint</a> (written by the author of Vue.js).<p>It&#x27;s scary to think what would happen if one of these services (Mint, Personal Capital, Plaid) had a backend data breach. If they can log in to your financial sites, a breach would mean the attacker would be able to as well.
评论 #20064402 未加载
评论 #20064157 未加载
lol768将近 6 年前
This mostly seems to be required because banks don&#x27;t provide usable data properly. There should be a way to tie together authorisations and finalized transactions. Any API&#x2F;interface that doesn&#x27;t permit this is just broken.<p>Monzo&#x27;s API includes a unique transaction ID as well as a timestamp to indicate when (if it has happened) the transaction &#x27;settled&#x27;. The open banking APIs implemented by the CMA9 include a BookingDateTime and Status (Booked or Pending) and an immutable transaction ID. It&#x27;s surely just common sense to do this.<p>Why is there no regulation to require banks expose a <i>usable</i> API in NA?
评论 #20064202 未加载
评论 #20063580 未加载
dangero将近 6 年前
Reminder that most banks still don’t provide an oauth api for granting read only access to your account info, so we end up with scraping data and problems like this to solve. Plus there is a ton of completely unnecessary risk created here by forcing users to furnish full access credentials to their bank accounts. It’s beyond stupid.
评论 #20064520 未加载