TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Z3 Theorem Prover

137 点作者 ____Sash---701_将近 6 年前

4 条评论

JohnStrangeII将近 6 年前
This is not really meant as a critique, more of a general suggestion for implementers to improve their docs. As someone who teaches logic and works with standard logics from time to time (HOL with Lambek Calculus, normal and classical modal logics, and plain old FOL), I&#x27;ve found it unnecessarily hard to figure out from the docs with what logics you can implement in them, whether you can just load these and use them, how to enter formulas, how to prove things, how to construct models, etc. This all seems overcomplicated in these tools, and almost all of them seem to mix up completely unrelated programming languages with logic. Couldn&#x27;t this all be simpler?<p>I understand that the typical use cases for these solvers are different. Still, I often wish there was a tool that I can just fire up, choose modal logic EMC from a menu and check whether a certain formula is a theorem. So far, it has always turned out easier for me to do this by hand than using a theorem prover.
评论 #20076586 未加载
评论 #20076298 未加载
hyper_reality将近 6 年前
I&#x27;ve used Z3 a lot for CTF challenges, but in my day-to-day work have never encountered any problems that it would be useful for. I&#x27;m interested to know how people have used it in the course of their work?
评论 #20074421 未加载
评论 #20075195 未加载
评论 #20075061 未加载
评论 #20074599 未加载
jmartinpetersen将近 6 年前
I seem to have somehow forgotten or missed the fact that it was MIT re-licensed a couple of years ago, instead of the previous &quot;no commercial use&quot; stuff. Thanks for the submission!
tiredneurons将近 6 年前
read this it&#x27;s seriously good <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;exhaustedneurons.github.io&#x2F;abstractions&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;exhaustedneurons.github.io&#x2F;abstractions&#x2F;</a>
评论 #20076915 未加载