TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Amazon Taking Down Erotica, Removing From Kindles

88 点作者 sahaj超过 14 年前

15 条评论

ghshephard超过 14 年前
To be clear, they are currently targeting "Incest" erotica. The irony, of course, is that Amazon's Television Commercial features a women on the beach reading her kindle, and the story on her kindle, is about a boy who has sex with his stepmother. Admittedly, not erotica, but still ironic.<p>Amazon should feel free to yank whatever it wants off its bookshelves (and, in fact, should probably be a bit more discerning given some of the recent crap they've been selling) - but, I don't know if they should be sending their customers _already purchased_ books into the memory hole.
评论 #2007592 未加载
rmc超过 14 年前
<i>When some of my readers began checking their Kindle archives for books of mine they’d purchased on Amazon, they found them missing from their archives</i><p>I think Amazon (and any bookseller) should be allowed to sell or not sell any sort of book they want. However deleting already paid for books that your customers have bought from their devices is totally unethical IMO.
评论 #2007775 未加载
评论 #2008415 未加载
评论 #2009181 未加载
prodigal_erik超过 14 年前
They already demonstrated their power to abuse your property with the <i>1984</i> fiasco, and that's the reason I don't own a Kindle. Fortunately it's possible to side-load ebooks from ethical vendors who don't demand an ability to steal your licenses yet keep your money.<p><a href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/how-to-load-up-your-kindle-with-non-amazon-ebooks.html" rel="nofollow">http://consumerist.com/2009/07/how-to-load-up-your-kindle-wi...</a><p>Whether root access is readily available on a Kindle is unclear to me.
评论 #2007947 未加载
评论 #2007528 未加载
w1ntermute超过 14 年前
What happened to not deleting books that had already been purchased?<p>&#62; Amazon effectively acknowledged that the deletions were a bad idea. “We are changing our systems so that in the future we will not remove books from customers’ devices in these circumstances,” Mr. Herdener said.<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/18/technology/companies/18amazon.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/18/technology/companies/18ama...</a>
评论 #2008423 未加载
评论 #2008416 未加载
madair超过 14 年前
the "debate" here is simply the utter failure by so many to recognize power abusing non-power for ideas deemed unsavory<p>just as is the inability of so many to recognize that it is exactly the same when wikileaks is refused a right to be <i>published</i> via server space<p>you "debaters" should be ashamed of yourselves...but you won't be. i don't fully understand that part. is it really that hard to see the shape of the nation? the commerce infrastructure? the war, imperialism, peonage, acquiescence to abuses in the name of stability and financial growth.<p>yet <i>nazis</i> DID exist, and <i>nazis</i> DO exists, and the more often Godwin's crock of a law is pompously imposed the more <i>will</i> exist. ask yourself: how did they exist? were the german middle class simply naturally evil spawn of the devil children waiting to grow up and be spawn of the devil killers? how did they rise? not some macro view, a micro view. how did the middle class of a western nation create the nazi's military machine?<p>have you considered that they were propagandized? and how did that occur? why was information lacking? is it possible that information was suppressed? who suppressed it?<p>you are not immune to the very same information deficit which you endorse. you are not immune to the very same fear which envelops the nation.<p>but you say, "this is incest, i just don't like incest". well, there's lots of things you might not like. perhaps for example consider that 80-90% of you are not gay. presumably you don't read gay fiction. why are gays allowed to have a <i>deviation from your norm while you are selectively willing to determine another deviation from your norm eligible for suppression</i>? try to keep in mind that <i>your cultural norm</i> is a shockingly violent culture filled with shocking amounts of violent fantasy. "oh but i don't like violent fantasy". yeah right, i'm talking to the other 99.9% of you then.<p>you &#60;--- yes you, reading this, are the middle-class of a western nation with quite a track record, and one that is only getting worse and so very very quickly year upon year of this century.<p>what questions will people ask 70 years from now to try to understand you. the middle-class "debaters"<p>metaphors are a powerful force against natural difficulty to place events into context. i would say you're only hurting yourselves, but actually you're hurting us all. You.
评论 #2008518 未加载
tzs超过 14 年前
Is there any independent confirmation of this? Parts of it sound made up.
jasongullickson超过 14 年前
I thought that Bezos himself said deleting books from people Kindles was "stupid";<p>Here we go: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/jul/24/amazon-drm" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/jul/24/amazon...</a>
评论 #2008419 未加载
评论 #2008353 未加载
re超过 14 年前
Poor title ("Removing From Kindles") on the HN submission:<p>&#62; A discussion thread on Amazon’s Kindle Community forum notes that Amazon has begun removing some previously-published books or stories from its store, and from the Kindle archives. Readers who have previously downloaded them to their Kindles can keep them there, but cannot re-download them (and will be refunded the price of purchase assuming Amazon can still find the purchase record).<p><a href="http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/amazon-removes-incest-related-erotica-titles-from-store-kindle-archive/" rel="nofollow">http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/amazon-removes-incest-related...</a> (linked from the submitted story)
sigzero超过 14 年前
Why "erotica" in the title and not "incest titles"? I know why. They aren't banning ALL erotica...just a particular one that most people would agree with Amazon on.
ktf超过 14 年前
You know what's full of explicit incest? Nabokov's <i>Ada, or Ardor</i>. It's also one of the most beautiful books I've ever read.<p>But it looks like it's not available on Kindle either, now that I check :)<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Ada-Ardor-Chronicle-Vladimir-Nabokov/dp/0679725229/" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Ada-Ardor-Chronicle-Vladimir-Nabokov/d...</a>
SeanDav超过 14 年前
Looks like I will be buying a Kindle or Amazon e-book about the time when hell freezes over....
javert超过 14 年前
A particular bookseller choosing not to sell incest erotica does not constitute a book being "banned" or "censored", which only apply when the government forcibly prevents <i>every</i> bookseller from selling particular material.<p>I wouldn't sell incest erotica either, and that doesn't mean I ban or censor books.<p>This kind of exaggeration on the part of the blog author doesn't help her argument; it just causes people to (a) lose intellectual respect for the author and (b) give less credence to her argument.
评论 #2007642 未加载
评论 #2011456 未加载
sliverstorm超过 14 年前
<i>I actually wrote those incest books as a result of a contest where it was the most popular category on the site...<p>Maybe you should expand your horizons.</i> <i>grin</i> -- The Author<p>Ok, I'm all for trying new things and all, but the world-wide cultural taboo against incest exists for a clearly defined reason (ref: Alexei Nikolaevich, for example), not just because we're all a buncha prudes.
评论 #2007786 未加载
评论 #2007654 未加载
评论 #2007638 未加载
评论 #2008738 未加载
rprasad超过 14 年前
This article is an exaggerated pile of crap. Pardon my language.<p>Amazon <i>is not</i> taking down erotica. They still have a very large and healthy erotica/romance section.<p>What they are doing is removing incest-erotica <i>published by Amazon's Createspace</i>. According to the pages the author links to in his post, incest-erotica from other publishers remains available for sale.<p>Incest, by the way, is illegal in most of America, except possibly in the South. It's no different from Amazon removing bestiality-erotica or pedophilia-erotica published under its own label.<p>Long story short: if you want to publish incest-erotica, <i>don't publish through Amazon's CreateSpace.</i>
评论 #2009330 未加载
kmfrk超过 14 年前
I think "Erotica" is a bit euphemistic for "incest fantasy".
评论 #2007657 未加载
评论 #2007575 未加载