TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Question mark hangs over trendy tech startup domains

108 点作者 shioyama将近 6 年前

10 条评论

robalfonso将近 6 年前
This is not the crisis it&#x27;s being portrayed as. Up until a year or two ago. .io was run directly by the ICB. It had issues as it&#x27;s not straight forward managing root level dns and the other related tasks of a registry.<p>Since then a company called Afilias is running .io (they also run .org, .info among many others). Whoever maintains governance of the .io tld is separate from the actual infrastructure running .io. As long as the owners of .io want to keep cashing the checks then nothing will change as the whole operation is outsourced. This is similar to the island of tuvalu outsourcing all of .tv to verisign (they are the .com registry)<p>Source: I work in the domain industry
评论 #20084904 未加载
bhouston将近 6 年前
The .io domain name is both expensive and somewhat unreliable. For example: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=15293578" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=15293578</a><p>We have used it for many years at <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;clara.io" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;clara.io</a>, but we are moving away from it back to .com for all new services.
评论 #20082385 未加载
tzs将近 6 年前
&gt; This week, the UN&#x27;s general assembly voted overwhelmingly 116-6 to condemn the UK&#x27;s occupation of the Chagos Islands. The non-binding resolution endorsed a decision by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in February that said the UK continued claim was illegal and the islands should be returned to the former British territory of Mauritius<p>The UK is a permanent member of the UN Security Council and has veto power on all substantive matters taken up by the Council.<p>Doesn&#x27;t that mean that they can pretty much ignore anything the General Assembly or most other international bodies tell them to do, just like the United States, Russia, and China do, because actually enforcing anything usually involves something that ends up requiring some kind of action that will require Security Council approval?
评论 #20084786 未加载
评论 #20085227 未加载
评论 #20083643 未加载
villgax将近 6 年前
.ai is run manually by a hard working bloke in Anguila, ironic.
评论 #20083663 未加载
评论 #20082048 未加载
评论 #20082798 未加载
评论 #20074800 未加载
cryptos将近 6 年前
I&#x27;ve always found the .io domain somewhat laughable for tech companies. Maybe its popularity was fueld by Google&#x27;s I&#x2F;O conference.<p>But except of legal affairs the climate crisis is the next reason not to rely on this domain. If the humanity continues its course the &quot;.io island&quot; will soon be under water.
评论 #20083678 未加载
mprev将近 6 年前
Is there a precedent that points towards a possible outcome for .io? Has there been a similar case of a country ceasing to exist with an impact on its gtld?
评论 #20082961 未加载
homero将近 6 年前
I remember the .ly dangers around 2011
评论 #20084127 未加载
cwmma将近 6 年前
considering that the .su domain still works fine, I kinda doubt .io will ever go away even if the sea swallows the islands
kabwj将近 6 年前
I’m sure I saw this thread a few days ago with the same comments. Glitch?
评论 #20085151 未加载
jnwkw将近 6 年前
Return the islands? To whom? They are populated by &quot;95.88% British &#x2F; American&quot; it seems.
评论 #20081481 未加载
评论 #20076966 未加载