GrapheneOS – A privacy and security-focused mobile OS with Android compatibility

366 点作者 yegortimoshenko将近 6 年前

18 条评论

letstrynvm将近 6 年前

Librem seems to have the correct way forward, reject the big mess of Android and catch up to it with completely Open pieces.<a href="https://puri.sm/products/librem-5/" rel="nofollow">https://puri.sm/products/librem-5/</a>They're making good progress and I can't wait to be able to update my handheld device with mainline pieces for as long as anyone who still uses one cares to update it. Currently my Samsung Android device is at Dec 2018 patchlevel and nothing I can do about it.

评论 #20151693 未加载

评论 #20149495 未加载

评论 #20149649 未加载

评论 #20152754 未加载

评论 #20154502 未加载

评论 #20149969 未加载

评论 #20150556 未加载

评论 #20152454 未加载

评论 #20153380 未加载

评论 #20150799 未加载

neilv将近 6 年前

A very condensed version of the messy CopperheadOS implosion is: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CopperheadOS#History" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CopperheadOS#History</a>It's good that the tech person is moving on, but Android doesn't seem a great starting point if privacy&security are the top priorities (as opposed to remaining captive in the Android camp, with some belief that you're a bit more secure than default).

评论 #20149893 未加载

评论 #20149473 未加载

评论 #20149067 未加载

ignoramous将近 6 年前

Creator of CopperheadOS [0] and now GrapheneOS, Daniel Micay, was a prolific contributor to rustlang-core [1] but did rub off the rustlang community the wrong way? If I'm not mistaken he has a history of contributing to Arch Linux, as well.What happened with CopperheadOS was unfortunate [2]. I hope Daniel [3] is able to work on GrapheneOS on his own terms [4]. The work that was done had garnered a lot of following and there's hope, given his exploits in the past, that he'd be able to steer this non-profit to heights where industry leaders building SilentCircle [5] and CyanogenMod failed.Sure will be following the project from afar and routing for its success.Good luck Daniel.[0] <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/CopperheadOS/comments/8qdnn3/goodbye/" rel="nofollow">https://www.reddit.com/r/CopperheadOS/comments/8qdnn3/goodby...</a>[1] <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9551937#9552769" rel="nofollow">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9551937#9552769</a>[2] <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17289536" rel="nofollow">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17289536</a>[3] <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=strcat" rel="nofollow">https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=strcat</a>[4] <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19501643#19559969" rel="nofollow">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19501643#19559969</a>[5] <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12047219" rel="nofollow">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12047219</a>

评论 #20149702 未加载

评论 #20150435 未加载

评论 #20149633 未加载

评论 #20149925 未加载

评论 #20152005 未加载

racuna将近 6 年前

Also, <a href="https://postmarketos.org/" rel="nofollow">https://postmarketos.org/</a> is a good project too.

评论 #20150031 未加载

评论 #20153653 未加载

mlinksva将近 6 年前

<a href="https://grapheneos.org/#roadmap" rel="nofollow">https://grapheneos.org/#roadmap</a> is pretty interesting:> Details on the roadmap of the project will be posted on the site in the near future. In the long term, it aims to move beyond a hardened fork of the Android Open Source Project. Achieving the goals requires moving away from relying the Linux kernel as the core of the OS and foundation of the security model. It needs to move towards a microkernel-based model with a Linux compatibility layer, with many stepping stones leading towards that goal including adopting virtualization-based isolation.

评论 #20151197 未加载

ThinkBeat将近 6 年前

It supports the Google Pixel range of phones only so far.So in order to get that is more secure and more independent from Google I have to buy a Google phone?

评论 #20150163 未加载

评论 #20150727 未加载

评论 #20151469 未加载

评论 #20150130 未加载

danvittegleo将近 6 年前

For anyone interested in doing their own customizable builds of AOSP for Pixel devices check out: <a href="https://github.com/dan-v/rattlesnakeos-stack" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/dan-v/rattlesnakeos-stack</a>. This doesn't have any of the security hardening features of GrapheneOS, but does have some of the same security properties like verified boot, OTA software updates that included updated firmware/drivers, support for remote attestation, etc.

xaduha将近 6 年前

Stock-ish Android that gets updates is good enough for me. I'm looking forward to wider support of U2F over NFC in general though, I don't keep data on the phone itself.You can buy a contactless smartcard for $15 each and install this on it <a href="https://github.com/tsenger/CCU2F" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/tsenger/CCU2F</a>

rplnt将近 6 年前

What does it matter if you are still running proprietary software with direct memory and CPU access on your network, camera, ...Android can give you privacy and enough security for most people. This can't add much more as long as its running on the same devices.This is a great effort and I support it, but let's not imagine this will make our phones that much more secure.

评论 #20150558 未加载

评论 #20151431 未加载

dvduval将近 6 年前

Would this be something Huawei might get into?

评论 #20151670 未加载

_Ender将近 6 年前

"Android compatibility" implies that it's something entirely new. It appears to be an Android fork that simply hasn't done away with compatibility. There are neat ideas and all, but the title implies that it's something that it isn't.Lastly, I wonder how this will do over time considering Fuschia.

评论 #20156306 未加载

markstos将近 6 年前

I can see what the focus is, but I couldn't find a page that clearly spelled out differences with AOSP. I realize that's a missing target, but as a potential user it's interesting to know how it's going to be different than stock Android (beyond what the "focus" is).

nerd7473将近 6 年前

I need to try this, I also need to get a Librem 5, and build my project for it. Anyone know of any good projects for replacing google services with FOSS services that do the same basic things?

techsin101将近 6 年前

I shouldnt be commenting. But os with new kernel like chrome os would be ideal for security, privacy and performance. Only thing left is open hardware not sure how to go about it.

julienfr112将近 6 年前

Is that like the real thing (graphene) and can do anything but go out of the lab ?

samirm将近 6 年前

how does this compare with something like microG?

评论 #20151372 未加载

tdxcbkif将近 6 年前

How does graphene compare to linage os?

AstralStorm将近 6 年前

Security focused and Android in the same sentence? All I can say is good luck with various firmware, custom services and drivers.

评论 #20148969 未加载

评论 #20151572 未加载

评论 #20150540 未加载

评论 #20149825 未加载

评论 #20149061 未加载