TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Schneier's take on the alleged backdoor in OpenBSD

41 点作者 cosgroveb超过 14 年前

4 条评论

jdp23超过 14 年前
I'm where he is. Interesting discussion, though -- and it really highlights the limits of "with many eyes all bugs are shallow".
davidj超过 14 年前
he didn't add anything new to the discussion but his opinion. Crypto scholars are excellent at cryptography and security theory, but when it comes to actually implementing secure systems (exception being crypto algorithms), and securing systems, Crypto scholars are horrible. For example he mentions that it would be better to just find an existing vulnerability instead of planting an FBI backdoor in the OpenBSD code: good luck Schneier, obviously you don't know that much about OpenBSD security culture and history. Plus the NSA has a history of putting backdoors into solutions. This is just my opinion from experience.
评论 #2017894 未加载
评论 #2017781 未加载
评论 #2017923 未加载
评论 #2017800 未加载
评论 #2017898 未加载
wazoox超过 14 年前
Given the past feats from Theo de Raadt, my guess is on a nice stunt to get a free thorough code check :)
评论 #2018168 未加载
bl4k超过 14 年前
Easy way to prove it isn't true:<p>Has there ever been a criminal case prosecuted in the USA where the FBI entered or revealed intercepted VPN data as evidence?
评论 #2019419 未加载
评论 #2018726 未加载