TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Ruin of Britain

82 点作者 microwavecamera将近 6 年前

4 条评论

elvinyung将近 6 年前
Matter of Britain&#x2F;Arthurian mythos nerd here.<p>It&#x27;s amazing how much of the Arthurian mythologies have been derived from varius vague allusions in this book. Probably lots of people know about the theory of Ambrosius Aurelianus as a possible candidate for historical King Arthur because of his role in the battle at Mount Badon, but what&#x27;s even more interesting is that in the book Gildas refers to a leader only by their sobriquet of &quot;the bear&quot;, which was rendered as <i>ursus</i> in Latin, but in Brythonic, it would&#x27;ve been <i>arth</i>.<p>Also another fun fact, Gildas never refers to Dumnonia by name, instead calls it &quot;Damnonia&quot; presumably to reflect his condemnation.
评论 #20197644 未加载
kitd将近 6 年前
<i>‘There was a historian in the time of the Britons, Gildas, who wrote about their misdeeds, how they exasperated God with their sins so much that He finally allowed the English army to conquer their land … Let us take warning from this: it is true what I say, we know of worse deeds among the English than we have heard of among the Britons.’</i><p>Note the use of &quot;English&quot; to equal Anglo-Saxons, and &quot;Britons&quot;, the original inhabitants, at a time when they were arch-enemies.
worik将近 6 年前
I thought this would be about Brexit.<p>The Ruin of Britain 2.0
评论 #20199344 未加载
selimthegrim将近 6 年前
Five kings criticized but only four mentioned? “Three centuries years later...”? Is this person a Guardian intern in their free time?
评论 #20196837 未加载