TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Who Has Comment Copyright Ownership In A Disqus Era?

15 点作者 drm237将近 17 年前

5 条评论

pg将近 17 年前
The commenter. Under current law you have copyright on something you write as soon as you write it.
评论 #203753 未加载
webwright将近 17 年前
Copyright ownership is one thing... I think that means that reproducing the comment elsewhere (in the "Best Disqus Comments EVAR Book of 2009" for example) would require permissin from the commenter.<p>But while you have rights to the creative work of the comment, I think the UGC site in question (whether it's Digg or Reddit) has the right to remove it or futz with it at will.<p>If I put a whiteboard outside and you draw a picture on it, it seems pretty ridiculous to think that you have the right to get upset if I erase it or even change it (or allow other people to erase it or change it). Of course, if I copied it, framed it, and sold it in a gallery...
bayleo将近 17 年前
Most services with primarily user-generated content have already covered their bases; check out the reddit ToS ("Rules of Usage," item #3) or digg's ToS (item #6) which dumps all their content under the CC umbrella.<p><a href="http://reddit.com/help/useragreement" rel="nofollow">http://reddit.com/help/useragreement</a> <a href="http://digg.com/tos" rel="nofollow">http://digg.com/tos</a>
评论 #203358 未加载
brlewis将近 17 年前
The example he cited isn't a copyright question. Deletion is not an exclusive right.
1gor将近 17 年前
From TFA:<p><pre><code> I would like to call for all comment systems to provide a mechanism to clearly indicate to users what rights they have and what rights they are giving out when they write a comment. </code></pre> Next to 'Submit' button (small print): "by pressing this you agree with TOS".<p>TOS: "You grant copyright on your comments to site owner" (or "you own your comments").