TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Doctors Slow to Adopt Tech Tools That Might Save Patients Money on Drugs

84 点作者 realshadow将近 6 年前

10 条评论

skwb将近 6 年前
I wonder how burdensome it is to even get the tool fully integrated into the ehr. Like are the doctors not using it because it requires manual input of drugs and insurance? Even then, the doctors aren’t necessarily getting paid more for doing this extra work; it’s the payer (insurance) company that is primarily benefiting.<p>To be clear, I am acutely aware of just how hard it is to get this sort of thing working (MS in health Econ, phd in biomedical and clinical informatics). Just keeping track of all the formularies seems like a pain just to to begin with!
评论 #20369213 未加载
评论 #20369688 未加载
评论 #20367957 未加载
aladoc99将近 6 年前
My experience with such a system has been that it would quote ridiculously high prices for generic medications, so I&#x27;d simply tell patients their drug is on the $4 list at WalMart. An information source that&#x27;s unreliable is worse than no information at all, since it poisons the well for competing systems.
dfeojm-zlib将近 6 年前
America is slow to adopt collective, independent negotiating of medical, hospital and prescription charges as happens in insurance, Medicare&#x2F;Medicaid&#x2F;Tricare. Med4all would solve this, rather than hunting around for big pharma &quot;sales&quot; and &quot;promotions.&quot;
评论 #20368809 未加载
评论 #20369806 未加载
DataDrivenMD将近 6 年前
They lost me at &quot;might.&quot;<p>You&#x27;d be hard-pressed to find many docs (myself included) who are champing at the bit to adopt an informational resource with knowledge gaps.
评论 #20367604 未加载
doctorpangloss将近 6 年前
&quot;Doctors Slow to Use Some Startup&#x27;s Thing That My New York Party Acquaintance Asked Me To Talk About&quot;
评论 #20367872 未加载
评论 #20367454 未加载
hereme888将近 6 年前
&quot;Doctors slow to...&quot; Implies all doctors. Then the article begins with an emotional story about one patient. Statistical facts don&#x27;t come from an emotional argument. That&#x27;s what politicians and marketers do.<p>What&#x27;s more likely: that the hardest working, highest average IQ professionals are slow to adopt something that would help them save their patient&#x27;s lives? Or that the writer of the article is biased and exaggerating things?
评论 #20367849 未加载
评论 #20367600 未加载
评论 #20367712 未加载
评论 #20369599 未加载
评论 #20367635 未加载
gscott将近 6 年前
Walmart, Target and some others have lists of low prices drugs for common conditions.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.walmart.com&#x2F;cp&#x2F;$4-prescriptions&#x2F;1078664" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.walmart.com&#x2F;cp&#x2F;$4-prescriptions&#x2F;1078664</a>
darawk将近 6 年前
That&#x27;s because they have no incentive to, and for the most part, neither do their patients.
travisoneill1将近 6 年前
The industry is medieval. I had to get a CT scan in the ER while traveling once and the only way the medical records office could communicate to get the scan was fax or email, and they sent me the images by mailing a CD (in 2018)!
评论 #20368642 未加载
dsfyu404ed将近 6 年前
Why would they be fast? It&#x27;s not their money. The incentive is not there. Meanwhile on the other side switching anything is work. Of course it doesn&#x27;t get done super quick.