TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Why is HN so aggressively anti-Bitcoin?

36 点作者 crypticlizard将近 6 年前
Two articles on the front page right now, both littered with negative comments. Google invested in Chainlink recently, is HN anti Chainlink/Blockchain? In other words, are there any blockchains that HN (generally speaking) has a positive opinion of?

29 条评论

JoshTriplett将近 6 年前
I don&#x27;t think HN is anti-blockchain. HN is anti-hype. Bitcoin and blockchain are not the solutions for every problem; HN can sometimes respect the hustle of &quot;say blockchain so that you get more VC money&quot;, but that <i>doesn&#x27;t</i> mean HN won&#x27;t criticize the actual technology if it&#x27;s &quot;X but with Blockchain!!&quot;. And HN can go either way on &quot;technical solutions for social&#x2F;legal problems&quot;, so it&#x27;s at least <i>controversial</i> to suggest that a blockchain will solve a social&#x2F;legal problem without doing anything but writing code.
评论 #20387649 未加载
vorpalhex将近 6 年前
All blockchains have fundamental problems including the majority problem[1]. They don&#x27;t really solve any problems, because all blockchain problems are just restating other problems with the words &quot;but on the blockchain&quot; added. Tracking your fruit to make sure it&#x27;s fresh by making trucks have sensors that post to the blockchain? Yeah, you&#x27;re just shifting the burden of trust from whoever fills out the paperwork to whoever made and installed the sensor - you haven&#x27;t done anything.<p>It&#x27;s a buzzword that&#x27;s used blindly in the hopes of attracting capital [2] that has no real meaning. Out of a dozen blockchain related job offers I was approached with, not a SINGLE founder could answer simple questions about how to assure verification or prevent blockchain manipulation.<p>Blockchain is up there with fad diets, crazy health claims for boring foods, and nonsense cancer treatments. Does it have a potential role? Sure, it&#x27;d probably be kind of a cute feature in a game.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.investopedia.com&#x2F;terms&#x2F;1&#x2F;51-attack.asp" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.investopedia.com&#x2F;terms&#x2F;1&#x2F;51-attack.asp</a> [2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wsj.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;bringing-blockchain-to-the-coffee-cup-1523797205" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wsj.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;bringing-blockchain-to-the-coff...</a>
codegeek将近 6 年前
Can&#x27;t speak for others but my thoughts are:<p>1. It has become more of a speculative instrument than an actual currency. People are more concerned about making money buying&#x2F;selling&#x2F;holding BTC. Defeats the original purpose of a &quot;decentralized currency&quot;<p>2. Not sure that decentralized currency is a good thing. Some things need to be regulated unfortunately. Yes, we all hate the central banks etc but I would trust a regular currency anyday over BTC. Not to mention that you are at the mercy of these &quot;wallets&quot; or even worse &quot;centralized wallets&quot; like coinbase etc which again defeats the purpose in my opinion.<p>3. It wastes electricity. A lot of it just to mine. Why do we need to mine it again ? Oh it is because there is only so much of it ? Is that a good thing ? I don&#x27;t know.<p>4. Most importantly: adoption. My mother has no idea what BTC is and will ever know. It is far too away from being a currency that can be used by regular people. Perhaps that day will come but not yet.<p>5. Too many scams due to the gold rush of BTC. Again, that is a bad thing.<p>Disclaimer: I don&#x27;t know much about BTC but still have these thoughts about it.
carapace将近 6 年前
I can&#x27;t speak for all of HN...<p>My $0.02: it wastes electricity to solve a non-problem.
评论 #20385455 未加载
slang800将近 6 年前
I obviously can&#x27;t speak for all of HN, but I&#x27;m annoyed by the number of projects that include blockchain technology for no good reason.
评论 #20385565 未加载
评论 #20385707 未加载
bdcravens将近 6 年前
HN in general hates hype. The technology behind Bitcoin is interesting; &quot;to the moon!&quot; isn&#x27;t. Blockchains have a few use cases when they are better than a database, but not billions of dollars in VC worth. That money is the result of FOMO, not innovation.
code_chimp将近 6 年前
I personally like Hyperledger Fabric (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.hyperledger.org&#x2F;projects&#x2F;fabric" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.hyperledger.org&#x2F;projects&#x2F;fabric</a>) for a private blockchain technology.<p>That being said I still have not found the problem that it is the solution for other than addressing our CTO&#x27;s case of FOMO.
评论 #20385465 未加载
smt88将近 6 年前
My take is that it&#x27;s several things:<p>- Lots of crypto links posted to HN are scams or have no technical merit<p>- No one has come up[1] with a use case for blockchain that actually requires blockchain, outside of cryptocurrency (which is something non-technical people and speculators don&#x27;t understand or won&#x27;t admit)<p>- Because of rampant scams and speculation, a lot of online blockchain&#x2F;crypto conversations have a high noise-to-signal ratio<p>1. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hackernoon.com&#x2F;ten-years-in-nobody-has-come-up-with-a-use-case-for-blockchain-ee98c180100" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hackernoon.com&#x2F;ten-years-in-nobody-has-come-up-with-...</a>
评论 #20388066 未加载
mstaoru将近 6 年前
Many on HN had experiences with investment, or are themselves, investors. We need to see either enormous traction (beyond speculation) or solving of an actual customer problem. So far not a single &quot;X but with Blockchain&quot; startup did not deliver anything of true value.<p>Personal anecdote: a friend of mine was working on a project to utilize extremely counterfeit-resistant holographic tags to authenticate organic produce in China (where anything can be faked). 2-3 years and he still didn&#x27;t have any significant customers. Enter Blockchain. They replaced the tag with a QR code, &quot;blockchain cannot be faked&quot; mantra, and within 6 months got $4 million investment and some customers. So when you scan the QR code, it opens a web page that shows some fancy data like id, date of packaging, etc. Who provides this data? The company. Who provides the web page? The company. Who can alter this data in any way they want? The company. And now the punchline: there is no blockchain in the code. Zero.
conception将近 6 年前
For me personally, I think it&#x27;s the fact that Bitcoin and especially other cryptos, are far far less secure than people think from attacks. The amount of money you need to move the market or execute at 51% attack (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.crypto51.app&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.crypto51.app&#x2F;</a>) especially if you are working with other large investors is trivial. For a group that loves independence from &quot;big banks&quot; and &quot;Fiat&quot; and the democratization of money, they seem to miss out that they are constantly being manipulated by rich coin holders.
评论 #20385434 未加载
评论 #20388090 未加载
RandomBacon将近 6 年前
&gt; are there any blockchains that HN (generally speaking) has a positive opinion of?<p>Other than Bitcoin, three other coins that are sometimes talked about here are Ethereum, Monero, Zcash.<p>Ethereum was the first ICO. Many other tokens operate on its blockchain.<p>Monero is an open source project with lots of development and progress (third behind Bitcoin and Ethereum). Its transactions are private.<p>Zcash is open source but mainly developed by a for-profit company and uses interesting mathematics. Its transactions are public, with the option of being private.<p>Disclaimer: I&#x27;m only &quot;invested&quot; in one of the three coins I mentioned.
thefounder将近 6 年前
I believe many people are against using crypto currencies as an investment opportunity instead of a technology solution.<p>The primary property of a good currency is stability. The crypto currencies are exactly the opposite.<p>I like smart contracts but I don&#x27;t think public&#x2F;permission-less blockchains are feasible&#x2F;very useful in the real world. Engaging in a tech and electricity spending race doesn&#x27;t look like a good way to verify transactions and protect the blockchain against attacks.
PaulHoule将近 6 年前
Personally I like Ripple.<p>I like permissioned blockchains.<p>Why is it that blockchains weren&#x27;t invented sooner? I&#x27;ll contend that you&#x27;d be laughed out of any distributed systems conference if you suggested any protocol where the workload capacity doesn&#x27;t increase when you add nodes.<p>If you have ten traders who trade under a buttonwood tree, then having ten copies of the database makes the system bulletproof. If you have ten million traders, there is no additional gain, but there is a huge cost because you have ten million copies of the database.<p>Blockchains attract people who know nothing about money or technology the same way that pot startups attract stoners. It&#x27;s just a bad scene.
评论 #20385601 未加载
评论 #20385301 未加载
评论 #20388093 未加载
评论 #20385460 未加载
tracker1将近 6 年前
As a currency, there&#x27;s maybe some merit in given scenarios. But all of the &quot;me too, I have $CURRENCY$, it&#x27;s different this time&quot; doesn&#x27;t lead to a lot of faith.<p>It&#x27;s over-hyped in general. Beyond that, often implemented in was suggested that don&#x27;t really add much value compared to any number of other less complicated solutions.<p>If you are in a situation, where you have competing parties not aligned who want to ensure a given transaction is applied, and don&#x27;t mind the implementation of that transaction being completely public, then blockchain might be the right solution.<p>If you are wanting to use cryptocurrency for financial transactions, then there is some merit, but in many cases suggested it&#x27;s effectively a corporatist overload control over currency (such as Facebook&#x27;s currency suggestion). If it&#x27;s actual bitcoin or a handful of other alt-coins, at least it&#x27;s decentralized but not as anonymous as many think. It&#x27;s also, in general difficult to use without some centralization.<p>In the end, someone will win in this game. My guess is the banks behind the winner (MasterCard and Visa are backing FB&#x27;s Libre venture). Given the actions against people with unpopular views (even if they are wrong thinking assholes), it terrifies me. Freedom to exchange property, and currency is a stand in for property, is a big deal and at least as big a deal as speech.
brycehamrick将近 6 年前
Reading through the criticisms my main takeaway is that (1) there&#x27;s a severe lack of empathy for the segment of the world that doesn&#x27;t have the luxury of a stable currency and developed financial infrastructure, and (2) there&#x27;s some extreme misconceptions about both the technology and the economics behind Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. If your main point of opposition is that there&#x27;s too much &quot;hype&quot; you&#x27;re being contrarian for the sake of being contrarian.
verdverm将近 6 年前
Hyperledger can be useful, more in the non-tech sense, but then the cryptokiddies get all irate, lol, part of the fun.<p>HN tends to shun Blockchain because it has a non trivial amount of fraud and amature hour to it... IMHO. Too much focus on the marginally useful tech, and not enough on the outcomes (i.e. CO2 from mining) and solving real problems. Too much neolib. Forgetting no one really wants their finances made public to the world.
peteforde将近 6 年前
I remain intrigued by Stellar Lumens and the protocol behind it. Ripple gets the attention but my perception is that Stellar&#x27;s tech is a superior fork.
yongjik将近 6 年前
HN usually has lots of negative comments - some of them are even constructive negative comments. It&#x27;s not necessarily a bad thing. I come here to read these intelligent criticism.<p>Besides, I don&#x27;t think it&#x27;s particularly more negative on cryptocurrencies - go to any other internet forum (that are not specialized in cryptocurrencies) and I think you&#x27;ll find a similar mixture of opinions.<p>Finally, &quot;Google also invested in X&quot; isn&#x27;t a very good counter-argument here. Have you seen some HN comments when Google is being discussed?
jki275将近 6 年前
Chainlink is a scam. Other than that, there&#x27;s a ton of hype and BS in the cryptocurrency world, lots of Ponzi schemes and fraud.<p>That&#x27;s where a lot of negative opinion comes from.
rhapsodyv将近 6 年前
A comment off topic of a fashion that police have found in my country, they have discovered gangs are mining bitcoin with theft of electric power. Almost a real gold mine
Urgo将近 6 年前
Coinbase was a YC S12 company for what its worth.
评论 #20385510 未加载
dawhizkid将近 6 年前
I think it&#x27;s the same reasons behind the infamous &quot;Show HN&quot; Dropbox post - technical people have a tendency to be too focused on pointing out technical flaws and miss the bigger picture.<p>Or it&#x27;s psychological and many feel better believing that is a scam because they missed the run up despite likely being knowledgeable about bitcoin years ago and decided to ignore it.
评论 #20385673 未加载
agentultra将近 6 年前
&gt; In other words, are there any blockchains that HN (generally speaking) has a positive opinion of?<p>I can&#x27;t speak for all of HN but I seriously doubt there was ever a need for the technology to begin with.<p>I&#x27;ve read numerous investigative articles on Bitcoin, in particular, that document the environmental impact and harm it does to workers who live in remote data centers. The situation is poor. And few, if any, bitcoin enthusiasts see these as problems. From what I understand the consensus among bitcoin enthusiasts is that we&#x27;ll technology our way out of this and somehow we&#x27;ll live in their techno-libertarian-utopia once they figure these things out.<p>Frankly I don&#x27;t share their ideology.
mabbo将近 6 年前
Because bitcoin is solving a problem that isn&#x27;t a real problem by introducing a dozen more problems the existing system has solved.<p>Bitcoin decentralizes currency and leaves no one entity in control. Hurrah, the government can&#x27;t stop you from moving money as you see fit. Except that most of the time, the government is stopping people from doing things that were made illegal for <i>very good reasons</i>. Money laundering of proceeds of crime, terrorist financing, tax evasion. You can debate all day about whether taxes are inherently evil, but right now the law says they are legal and you&#x27;ve gotta pay them. Saying &quot;No worries man, I&#x27;ve got a NEW currency that the government can&#x27;t stop&quot; doesn&#x27;t make it not a crime.<p>All the while, it&#x27;s not actually free. We&#x27;re burning huge amounts of energy to do mining, and the costs have to be passed on to someone. Miners get free BTC for mining, but that&#x27;s a closed system- someone eventually must pay real currency for that energy being used. And it&#x27;s getting expensive given the number of miners. (Plus, a lot of them are China which is using coal as it&#x27;s primary energy source, which is killing people from pollution!)<p>And finally, there&#x27;s no inflation&#x2F;deflation controls. A currency&#x27;s utility is increased by it&#x27;s stability. Not knowing if my BTC will double in price or drop by half in the next 2 weeks means every day is a gamble. If this were my only currency, I&#x27;d be terrified about buying groceries.<p>Oh, and let&#x27;s not forget that the huge spike in BTC prices in the last few years were found likely to have been caused by manipulation.<p>I love crypto and think bitcoin&#x2F;blockchains are a really neat technology. But I just wish they weren&#x27;t here, in the real world, because they seem to be a net-loss for the world, and a Ponzi scheme.<p>Edit after getting a coffee: ... okay, that was a bit of a rant...
评论 #20385666 未加载
duxup将近 6 年前
To many people bitcoin (and similar crypto currency) more than adequately demonstrates why the protections provided by governments and etc for financal orgnizations, transactions exist &#x2F; are needed.<p>As for blockchain I think we&#x27;ve seen a number of &quot;solutions&quot; to problems that are adequately solved by a database.
KaiserPro将近 6 年前
Why? because its not the golden saviour.<p>Firstly its a panopticon, not anonymous<p>Secondly, it has a transaction rate of &lt;10 a second Globally.<p>Thirdly, its chowing down huge amounts of power for no real gain<p>Fourthly, its snake oil. Its value comes from its mystique. As a store of wealth its horrifically expensive, as a trading currency, its too slow, you might as well buy gold.<p>Yes, its has a neat idea behind it, but blockchains are inherently niche. They have very few applications outside exceptionally high value, low transaction, zero trust systems.<p>Etherium and its smart contracts are inherently flawed, because they are not smart, or contracts. Unless your &quot;contract&quot; has a binary outcome, that is faultlessly measurable, then they aren&#x27;t for you. The entire point of a contract is that there is a third party capable of issuing binding resolutions, using all available evidence. Etherium gives you none of that, despite the hype.<p>The only thing that might be worthy of a blockchain is something like the changelog of wikipedia, but then its not worth the spectacular cost. Just keep a couple of mirrors.
cipherpro将近 6 年前
In general people are critical of ideas that are new. HN has an especially critical user-base with technical skills, so attacks can be made on a larger surface area.
评论 #20385431 未加载
lostmsu将近 6 年前
Bitcoin, for being the original.<p>Ethereum, for providing smart contracts, that enabled many ICOs.<p>Monero&#x2F;ZCash for being private.<p>All other currencies are mostly just clones of the 3 (meaning they can suffer from 50%+1 attacks), or remove the main feature: trustless transactions.<p>In general, unless a currency provides a novel consensus algorithm, that brings something new to the table, it would actually be better off as a token on one of the above. If it is not, likely it is a scam&#x2F;money grab.<p>All other projects do not really need blockchain, with a rare exception.<p>Disclosure: I own ETH and BTC.
评论 #20392451 未加载
jamroom将近 6 年前
I think a lot of HN users like to think of themselves as early adopters of new technology and are disappointed for missing out on the crypto highs at the end of 2017. I think they feel if they could have been in the loop at that time they could have cashed out. Thus crypto discussions are going to have a lot of negativity in the comments since the best way to make yourself feel better about it is to pretend it was a scam all along and you really didn&#x27;t miss out. My 2 cents of course :)
评论 #20385597 未加载
评论 #20385485 未加载
评论 #20385440 未加载
评论 #20385405 未加载