TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: How to calculate best subscription fee

14 点作者 WadeWilliams超过 14 年前
I'm trying to determine which is a better membership pricing structure; $20 / year versus $50 / year.<p>The lower price will increase the number of subscribers but lower the revenue per customer (obviously). The higher number will do the opposite.<p>Is there some information somewhere (not many good search engine results) on ways to compare these two pricing structures? Perhaps some graphs and mathematical explanation of what the advantage of the lower price with more members is versus the higher price with fewer members?<p>Thanks to any responders.

13 条评论

tptacek超过 14 年前
$50/year is too low. It's less than $5/month. I spend roughly that <i>per day</i> on coffee... and yet I'd still hesitate to sign up for something on the Internet for $5/month, just as much as I'd hesitate if it was $10 or $15 or $30/month.
评论 #2042986 未加载
petervandijck超过 14 年前
Charge 9.99$/month instead of 50$/year. You'll likely get more subscribers, and make more money.
tshauck超过 14 年前
If you could find some way to model the price vs demand you could then figure out how elastic the price is (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_elasticity_of_demand" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_elasticity_of_demand</a>) then that would tell you which price is better.
inetsee超过 14 年前
I believe a better pricing model in many cases is to offer your product as a monthly subscription with discounts for longer subscriptions, e.g. $5 per month, $10 per quarter, $30 per year. The drawbacks to this model are that managing subscriptions may require more effort, and you need to be sure that your service provides enough value to get people coming back.<p>I also think your pricing plans are too low. If your service is for businesses (even small businesses) and it provides an obvious value to them, you should be able to charge more; like $10 - $20 per month (or more), again with discounts for longer terms. Even if your service is for individuals, $10 per month is not excessive. People pay $60 - $100 or more per month for cell phone service; $10 - $20 per month is not excessive for a valuable service.
ze_dude超过 14 年前
Joel Spolsky wrote about this exact subject (with graphs, etc. as requested). very worthwhile read: <a href="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/CamelsandRubberDuckies.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/CamelsandRubberDuckie...</a>
WadeWilliams超过 14 年前
It's a website subscription service that I'm trying to pack as much value as possible into.<p>I think it's worth $50.<p>My question is what are the best resources on this topic?<p>I suppose i need 2.5 as many times the members at the $20 rate to make generate the same revenue. I've got 100 users @ $50, but will I get 250 @ $20 ? If I did get 250 at $20, the revenue hasn't gone up.<p>$50 seems like the better plan to me. Ofcourse, if I ask the users who haven't subscribed and still use the free model, they think $50 is too much and they would be more likely to pay $20.<p>I'm sure there's lots of discussion on this topic out there, but as soon as you type in "membership subscription" at google you get garbage like pay pal and netflix, and not any nerdy discussion on the topic.
评论 #2042920 未加载
评论 #2042828 未加载
评论 #2043022 未加载
cletus超过 14 年前
Pricing is more art than science. It is based on many factors such as:<p>- perceived value<p>- competitor pricing<p>- your target market<p>- how directly your service let's people save mone or generate income (ie if your service does either it is more easily justifiable than a pure luxury)<p>- customer loyalty (eg some people are paying Dropbox when they don't need the space just because they love the service and want to support the company)<p>- supply (including the illusion of scarcity)<p>- cost structure<p>- luck<p>- etc<p>There is some theory and psychology around this but like all the social sciencesnit isn't exact.
citricsquid超过 14 年前
Please don't just do yearly subscriptions, I will rarely (if ever) sign up for a yearly subscription at first. If you <i>do</i> offer only yearly, make sure you also have some sort of trial.<p>Also StavrosK talked about subscription fees here: <a href="http://blog.historio.us/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.historio.us/</a>
评论 #2042883 未加载
评论 #2043097 未加载
revorad超过 14 年前
Pricing without knowing what you are selling is hard, but I guess you are charging too little.
评论 #2042891 未加载
noodle超过 14 年前
read this: <a href="http://www.neildavidson.com/dontjustrollthedice.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.neildavidson.com/dontjustrollthedice.html</a><p>on the flip side of that coin, i've read that and i'm still struggling to come up with a good pricing structure.
petervandijck超过 14 年前
Here's a good search that may help you: <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=site:ycombinator.com+customer+acquisition+cost" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=site:ycombinator.com+customer...</a>
vaksel超过 14 年前
don't guess. split test.<p>i.e. for me at $50, I sold X. at $40, I sold 2X, at $30 I sold 2X and at $20 I sold X.<p>Placing value on your product is important, if you charge too little, people will think you are selling crap and won't buy as much.<p>Your price is pretty much the single most important thing you can split test.
评论 #2043465 未加载
wiseleo超过 14 年前
No matter what you do, I recommend you have a clear grandfathering policy in place.<p>I am particularly generous in that department "Should you decide to return, we will reactivate your account at last billing tier even if that tier is no longer published on our site."<p>There are some conditions to that, such as material change of control events (all bets are off if you have been acquired).<p>Failure to do so results in upset customers and negative press coverage. Competitors love that. If you decide to lower prices, be sure to apply decreases to your existing customers. That's positive press.<p>I am experimenting with pricing as well and prefer my customers to be protected from effects of such experiments.<p>Annual subscriptions work great when they are a discount over monthly billing. The pattern tends to be that the user subscribes for a few months of month-to-month billing, realizes she is in love, and renews at annual level to save money.<p>I haven't seen the research, but I think you will find more annual subscriptions tend to be renewals rather than initial purchases. An annual subscription for $50 is below my pain threshold.<p>Let me illustrate my point. I pay some small amount for <a href="http://eventid.net" rel="nofollow">http://eventid.net</a>. I don't ever remember what it is, but I pay it annually. It's $29 and I had to look that up. It's just not material to bother with quarterly $12 payments when I can simply pay $29 and ignore this for the rest of the year.<p>Eventid is a useful service and all my subscription does is speed up Microsoft knowledge base searches. When I am billing my client for time spent figuring out the problem, the speed of research matters and so I pay for this service.<p>Another example: I pay for <a href="http://usaip.eu" rel="nofollow">http://usaip.eu</a> on a monthly basis $9. This actually just got lowered to $7.99. I primarily use the service to watch Formula 1 on BBC live and without commercials, but it also comes in handy for on-demand VPN connectivity that ALWAYS works when dealing with insecure WiFi networks (have you heard of firesheep? :)). I used to pay by the day, then by the week, now I pay by the month, and pretty soon I'll just pay for it once a year ($74.99) and again be done with it. That service also happens to bill me for European Union VAT, which I am technically not subject to, but again the cost is just not material enough for me to bother with.<p>I personally do not have free accounts at all. I have plenty of competitors who have free option. The fact is that should the customer decide to pay my competitor, they will likely re-evaluate the market anyway. My software integrates with too many things and simply delivers too much value. You get either 100 transactions or 14 days, whichever comes first. For most people, it pays for itself in one extra transaction as what my software does is maximize revenue per staff member. I do not yet have transaction-based pricing unlike say Recurly, but I will likely add that after we sign up enough customers.<p>I am guessing this is in regards to your water skiing log site? Determine the value and price accordingly. From what I know, water skiing is not a sport for poor people, so you may have price elasticity due to customer affluence. My snow ski equipment is quite expensive.<p>I'd probably keep the site free with a limit on how many entries can be made in a year and make a paid mobile interface as a subscription. As a skier, I would probably want to enter my data, complete with picture attachments, right after I am done with my run instead of when I get home. In essence, charge for usability. :)<p>One last thing - check out Wepay for subscription billing. Much cheaper than Paypal. They do not advertise that feature yet, but I spent some time with the team at the hackathon and was pleasantly surprised it was there. :)<p>Then again, I am just beginning with offering a SaaS solution. I could very well be wrong. I am easy enough to find on Twitter if you want to chat more. :)