Imaging Bell-type nonlocal behavior

Large versions of the images from the paper:<p>Figure 2: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;advances.sciencemag.org&#x2F;content&#x2F;advances&#x2F;5&#x2F;7&#x2F;eaaw2563&#x2F;F2.large.jpg" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;advances.sciencemag.org&#x2F;content&#x2F;advances&#x2F;5&#x2F;7&#x2F;eaaw256...</a><p>Figure 3: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;advances.sciencemag.org&#x2F;content&#x2F;advances&#x2F;5&#x2F;7&#x2F;eaaw2563&#x2F;F3.large.jpg" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;advances.sciencemag.org&#x2F;content&#x2F;advances&#x2F;5&#x2F;7&#x2F;eaaw256...</a><p>Figure 4: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;advances.sciencemag.org&#x2F;content&#x2F;advances&#x2F;5&#x2F;7&#x2F;eaaw2563&#x2F;F4.large.jpg" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;advances.sciencemag.org&#x2F;content&#x2F;advances&#x2F;5&#x2F;7&#x2F;eaaw256...</a>

I know this must be nuts, could someone ELI20?

A blog post is <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sciencealert.com&#x2F;scientists-just-unveiled-the-first-ever-photo-of-quantum-entanglement" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sciencealert.com&#x2F;scientists-just-unveiled-the-fi...</a>.<p>BBC article is <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bbc.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;uk-scotland-glasgow-west-48971538" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bbc.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;uk-scotland-glasgow-west-48971538</a>, discussed at <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=20423884" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=20423884</a>.

Maybe a bit off topic, but i&#x27;ve always wondered why most physicists dismiss the possibility of superdeterminism to escape Bell&#x27;s theorem. Are there any physicists here who would like to elaborate?