TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Cargill: The Worst Company in the World

313 点作者 vollmarj将近 6 年前

16 条评论

brianpgordon将近 6 年前
They&#x27;ll do exactly as much damage as they can get away with. If there&#x27;s no regulation standing in their way, or the potential profits outweigh the consequences, <i>of course</i> they&#x27;ll continue their malfeasance. I don&#x27;t know why this is surprising to anyone. The nature of any corporation is to act in its own self-interest. I guess Mighty Earth is doing what they can, but it&#x27;s like raking leaves in the forest, in the middle of a raging wildfire. The only way that anything is going to change is through effective regulation and credible enforcement. Trying to wheedle and cajole Cargill into growing a conscience is a manifest exercise in futility.
评论 #20447623 未加载
rhacker将近 6 年前
Totally distracting aside: I&#x27;ve always felt I wish I could walk around a store with a special set of glasses on so I could apply my own personal voting filters - Chili - benefits monsanto $0.05 per can, KRAFT Foods $1 per can<p>etc...<p>I mean I have a lot of values - I buy small label organics and that does a lot, but sometimes I just want to buy cheetos- I think I would think twice if I knew my enemies were benefitting.<p>Honestly I thought that was one of the purposes of something like G-Glass.<p>Anyway - but yeah, these companies exist because even if we know they are bad - we have no way of knowing what we are buying that is making them stay in power.<p>Money is our voting power - and unlike presidential elections, we generally have no idea what we&#x27;re voting for.
评论 #20446584 未加载
评论 #20446485 未加载
评论 #20447141 未加载
评论 #20446839 未加载
评论 #20446967 未加载
rossdavidh将近 6 年前
So, this may sound awkward but I&#x27;m going to say it anyway: this is what globalization enables. The very fact of sourcing things as elemental as the food you eat, from the other side of the planet (whichever side has the laxest environmental, health, and safety rules), makes this easier. It is easier to live far away from the things your company does, and the people it does them to, if they&#x27;re on a different continent than you. Moreover, by its very nature globalization enables regulatory arbitrage, so you can live in a country with relatively good EHS rules, and produce in a country with bad or no EHS rules.<p>There is a tradeoff between producing wealth, and trashing your environment, and I don&#x27;t judge too harshly the people who want to worry about carcinogens later, once they&#x27;ve got enough to eat that they won&#x27;t starve to death. But that tradeoff used to happen within each country. When it was poor, the production was low, and as their ability to wreck their environment scaled up, so did their wealth to afford not to.<p>Only globalization allows companies like this to descend with 1st World money on places with 3rd world EHS rules. Cargill and its ilk exist, because we changed the rules to make it easier for them to do this.
评论 #20447402 未加载
评论 #20447643 未加载
评论 #20447873 未加载
评论 #20447616 未加载
评论 #20447769 未加载
scottlocklin将近 6 年前
Brought to you by the Louis Dreyfus company, Archer Daniels Midland, Monsanto, Bunge, Callebaut, Glencore, Armajaro and so on...<p>There&#x27;s a great book &quot;Merchants of Grain&quot; written in the 70s about the secretive foods megabusinesses. It&#x27;s arguably gotten worse since then. They make oil companies look like public servants.
评论 #20448323 未加载
评论 #20449103 未加载
chipotle_coyote将近 6 年前
If you&#x27;re actually interested in <i>reading</i> this report as opposed to struggling through the web presentation, this is the link to the PDF:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mightyearth.org&#x2F;wp-content&#x2F;uploads&#x2F;Mighty-Earth-Report-Cargill-The-Worst-Company-in-the-World-July-2019.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mightyearth.org&#x2F;wp-content&#x2F;uploads&#x2F;Mighty-Earth-R...</a><p>This piece did inadvertently introduce me to Shorthand, which tells me that &quot;the world&#x27;s most successful digital storytelling teams&quot; are using it to &quot;create simply beautiful stories using&quot; Shorthand&#x27;s &quot;beautifully simple&quot; story editor. I can only wonder how much more successful those teams could be if they would beautifully, simply stop.
评论 #20446834 未加载
评论 #20446708 未加载
评论 #20446894 未加载
评论 #20446656 未加载
dmix将近 6 年前
Did they really make the authors photo take up half the page on mobile, even while scrolling down? That is a shockingly stupid idea.
评论 #20446594 未加载
评论 #20446432 未加载
评论 #20446813 未加载
评论 #20446299 未加载
Camillo将近 6 年前
Does anybody else get a Bernie Sanders type of feeling from this? A throwback to older issues and older battles, not seen since the 90s? It&#x27;s refreshing to see that someone still cares about the rainforests, but I don&#x27;t know if it&#x27;s going to stick. The energy of the environmental movement is now elsewhere; at the cosmic scale, in the fight against climate change; at the scale of smaller, practical changes, it&#x27;s in things like banning plastic straws.
rmason将近 6 年前
If you want to know more about the five grain companies read the book Merchants of Grain. All five have very sharp elbows and only one (Bunge) is public so a lot of the wrangling goes on in private. Cargill is the largest of all of them.
exabrial将近 6 年前
Just want to point out that I&#x27;m a Midwesterner and the line &quot;drank their polluted water&quot; is neither factual nor representative of me or any of my family or friends. There are a valid points you point out but please exclude hyperbole in your arguments.
评论 #20447208 未加载
评论 #20447194 未加载
readme3将近 6 年前
looking at the pictures of the baby orangutans melts my heart. cannot help but think , we have lost all compassion as humans.
seem_2211将近 6 年前
What an awful company.
评论 #20446435 未加载
thundergolfer将近 6 年前
&gt; In contrast to the oil and tobacco industries, for instance, the bad practices documented here are not inherent to the products Cargill sells, and are, in fact, entirely avoidable.<p>On the contrary, there are strong philosophical arguments that selling meat and eggs, as Cargill does, is &#x27;inherently&#x27; immoral.
评论 #20449015 未加载
Gene5ive将近 6 年前
Globalization is inevitable. Death by self-induced extinction is not.
fallingfrog将近 6 年前
Never heard of it. I suppose that&#x27;s intentional.
hcurtiss将近 6 年前
Seriously? Worst company in the world? Come on. They’re responding to demand. If Cargill doesn’t buy the palm oil, another importer&#x2F;distributor will. Sure, educate customers regarding the impacts of their purchases, but “worst company in the world” is just trolling. It’s this kind of partisan over-the-top hyperbole that turns people off and, IMHO, gets dudes like Trump elected.
评论 #20447385 未加载
评论 #20447128 未加载
评论 #20449606 未加载
评论 #20447112 未加载
vgetr将近 6 年前
The basis for this claim seems to hinge on the facts that Cargill is a) big and b) privately owned, both of which are sins in today&#x27;s political orthodoxy.<p>As a Minnesotan, I was wondering how long it would take before someone would notice them and shift their attention from Koch, but it had to happen at some point.
评论 #20446486 未加载
评论 #20446436 未加载