TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Isn't it Byronic? Don Juan at 200

22 点作者 gruseom将近 6 年前

2 条评论

gruseom将近 6 年前
Here’s one passage I remember after many years: Byron explaining how convenient it was for schoolboys that the editors of the classics had thoughtfully collected all the obscene bits in one place. They were too prudish to leave them in the text, but too scholarly to delete them altogether.<p><pre><code> Juan was taught from out the best edition, Expurgated by learnéd men, who place Judiciously, from out the schoolboy&#x27;s vision, The grosser parts; but, fearful to deface Too much their modest bard by this omission, And pitying sore his mutilated case, They only add them all in an appendix, Which saves, in fact, the trouble of an index; For there we have them all &quot;at one fell swoop,&quot; Instead of being scatter&#x27;d through the Pages; They stand forth marshall&#x27;d in a handsome troop, To meet the ingenuous youth of future ages, Till some less rigid editor shall stoop To call them back into their separate cages, Instead of standing staring all together, Like garden gods—and not so decent either.</code></pre>
评论 #20469254 未加载
throwaway3627将近 6 年前
Only Cantos I and II were available in 1819.<p>XVI and unfinished XVII were available in 1823 and 1824 respectively.