TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Show HN: PyDist – Private Python Package Hosting

25 点作者 alexbecker将近 6 年前

8 条评论

mariocesar将近 6 年前
Charging for uploads and downloads? isn&#x27;t that making the whole service inconvenient<p>It says 2000 monthly downloads. I will consume that in a single day with my automated CI pipeline. Is hard to take this into consideration.<p>Uploads and downloads makes sense to be unlimited. At least having bandwidth limits like any basic hosting service.
评论 #20522694 未加载
whitehouse3将近 6 年前
&gt; Helpful<p>&gt; Browse your packages and read their documentation just like on the public Python Package Index.<p>I don&#x27;t remember the last time I read package information from pypi. It&#x27;s all on Github or readthedocs or similar. And given that it isn&#x27;t especially difficult to host your own index [0] or make docker images with all the dependencies pre-installed, I don&#x27;t see how this justifies the price.<p>If it were available as an extension on Github or a self-hosted git server solution like GitLab, Gitea or Bitbucket, then that would be more interesting to me.<p>[0]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;packaging.python.org&#x2F;guides&#x2F;hosting-your-own-index&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;packaging.python.org&#x2F;guides&#x2F;hosting-your-own-index&#x2F;</a>
FluffyKitty将近 6 年前
For those looking to secure their systems from external source failures, I&#x27;d recommend taking a look at Sonatype&#x27;s Nexus Repository [1]. It supports a wide range of package sources and has the option to self-host.<p>I almost didn&#x27;t know that Github was down the other day because all the packages I was using were already cached on Nexus.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sonatype.com&#x2F;nexus-repository-software-component-management" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sonatype.com&#x2F;nexus-repository-software-component...</a>
评论 #20522338 未加载
somada141将近 6 年前
I&#x27;ve used DevPi [1] in my previous job while my current team uses Artifactory [2] and both are pretty decent solutions while the latter of course is rather expensive.<p>Personally I&#x27;ve found DevPi to be more than sufficient for a small-medium team that can spare a little time to set it up and maintain it but PyDist&#x27;s pricing plans would make it an attractive alternative (except for that download limit, that won&#x27;t fly).<p>That being said I wonder how a service like this will fare once the GitHub Package Registry [3] becomes mainstream and introduces Python support.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;devpi&#x2F;devpi" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;devpi&#x2F;devpi</a> [2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;jfrog.com&#x2F;artifactory&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;jfrog.com&#x2F;artifactory&#x2F;</a> [3] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;features&#x2F;package-registry" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;features&#x2F;package-registry</a>
bb88将近 6 年前
No offense, but I&#x27;m getting to the point of hating free trials.<p>Why?<p>1. Because you&#x27;re fixed in an arbitrary point of time, which means you have to focus on the free trial above other things, many of which might deliver higher value.<p>2. If you decide to not use it, it&#x27;s wasted time. Like a design decision that you don&#x27;t discover that&#x27;s a showstopper 40 hours into the trial.<p>3. 14 days really isn&#x27;t a good metric to decide if it&#x27;s worth using your service or not. You may not see real issues until you get at least a month into the service.<p>4. Anyone who is seriously considering purchasing the service isn&#x27;t going to bat an eye at the actual cost.
luhn将近 6 年前
It says it mirrors PyPI. Does that mean I can use --index-url rather than --extra-index-url? The latter has some properties that make it less than ideal for private packages.
评论 #20518231 未加载
philipov将近 6 年前
I &#x27;like&#x27; how instead of <i>Pricing</i>, the link to the pricing is ambiguously titled <i>Plans</i>, as if it were a link to their project roadmap instead of a payed service.
评论 #20518035 未加载
JulianWasTaken将近 6 年前
Nice work.<p>Obligatory question: how does it compare to DevPI?
评论 #20518272 未加载