TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Alarming surge in drug-resistant HIV uncovered

215 点作者 Guereric将近 6 年前

12 条评论

t34543将近 6 年前
I had a scare and took PeP this year. I had to ER shop. First one denied me coverage and made assumptions. I ended up getting care at a cost of ~$6000 to my insurance. I paid $270. I have great healthcare but this is obscene. I don’t want to get sick and die. I was being careful but accidents happen.
评论 #20582236 未加载
评论 #20583757 未加载
jimbob45将近 6 年前
Well, PrEP is a miracle drug that has gone criminally underutilized in the fight to eradicate HIV. It would be nice to see governments really push it hard for a change.
评论 #20582513 未加载
评论 #20583128 未加载
评论 #20580895 未加载
评论 #20580694 未加载
评论 #20582895 未加载
评论 #20582281 未加载
评论 #20580706 未加载
评论 #20581408 未加载
评论 #20581478 未加载
jxramos将近 6 年前
I always felt like the only way you can eliminate the spread of a highly adaptive std is to develop a low barrier on-the-spot test administered just before intercourse at the latest or some point reasonably earlier in a date or whatever. This would still fail under the dormancy period viruses assume but it should improve the odds I'd imagine for those connected in one way or another to promiscuous sexual networks.
评论 #20581216 未加载
评论 #20580924 未加载
评论 #20581960 未加载
评论 #20581163 未加载
评论 #20580894 未加载
tuxxy将近 6 年前
This is why PrEP is so important and everyone at risk should be on it. We need to spread PrEP use as far and wide as possible.
评论 #20582270 未加载
评论 #20580621 未加载
bhouston将近 6 年前
Because we haven't eradicated HIV but just slowed it down, it is the perfect situation for it to develop drug-resistance.
tim58将近 6 年前
#What -- In several geographically distant third world countries HIV is becoming antiretroviral resistant in ~10% of cases.<p>#Why -- No one is _really_ sure. The most popular hypothesis is that it happens when people go on and off the medicine. Why would people do this? Shame, access, and some mothers that went on only during pregnancy. WHO recommended a pregnancy only treatment until ~2015.<p>#Impact -- These resistant breeds can spread, presumably just like the other varieties. The people with it have a much worse prognosis than those without.<p>#PrEP -- All the other parent comments talk about it. Sure, it should be used more frequently. It&#x27;s a bit of a pipe dream to see it used in the 3rd world.
评论 #20581390 未加载
评论 #20582219 未加载
DanBC将近 6 年前
&gt; But drug-resistant HIV might develop when people interrupt treatment, she suggests.<p>[...]<p>&gt; People living with HIV might go on and off the drugs for several reasons.<p>They didn&#x27;t mention the fact that in most countries for most medications people just don&#x27;t take meds as they should. We see this for meds that are crucial to keep the person alive. Many organ transplants fail because the person fails to take meds correctly afterwards. We see this where patients need to pay for their meds and further treatment (the US) or where they get free meds and further treatment (the UK).<p>This isn&#x27;t a few percent of people who take meds. It&#x27;s over a third of them, maybe about half of them.<p>It&#x27;s a big problem.
drchewbacca将近 6 年前
Won&#x27;t all drugs targeted at microbes fail eventually? Surely they create a strong selective pressure which favours the resistant strains.<p>The wider and more frequently the drug is used the faster this process occurs?
评论 #20584282 未加载
评论 #20582793 未加载
dilippkumar将近 6 年前
This article in Scientific American’s April 2019 [0] is an excellent article that introduced me some of the details of HIV treatment.<p>While it isn’t related to the primary focus of the parent article, it gives some useful context.<p>&gt;&gt; At the end of this first stage, the viral load stabilizes at a level that can, puzzlingly, last for many years. Doctors refer to this level as the set point. A patient who is untreated may survive for a decade with no HIV-related symptoms and no lab findings other than a persistent viral load and a low and slowly declining T cell count.<p>&gt;&gt; Eventually, however, the asymptomatic stage ends and AIDS sets in, marked by a further decrease in the T cell count and a sharp rise in the viral load. Once an untreated patient has full-blown AIDS, opportunistic infections, cancers and other complications usually cause the patient&#x27;s death within two to three years.<p>&gt;&gt; The key to the mystery was in the decade-long asymptomatic stage. What was going on then? Was HIV lying dormant in the body? Other viruses were known to hibernate like that. The genital herpesvirus, for example, hunkers down in nerve ganglia to evade the immune system. The chicken pox virus also does this, hiding out in nerve cells for years and sometimes awakening to cause shingles. For HIV, the reason for the latency was unknown.<p>...<p>&gt;&gt; When the researchers reran the experiment, fit the data to the model&#x27;s predictions and estimated its parameters again, they obtained results even more staggering than before: 10 billion virus particles were being produced and then cleared from the bloodstream each day. Moreover, they found that infected T cells lived only about two days. The surprisingly short life span added another piece to the puzzle, given that T cell depletion is the hallmark of HIV infection and AIDS.<p>&gt;&gt; The discovery that HIV replication was so astonishingly rapid changed the way that doctors treated their HIV-positive patients. Previously physicians waited until HIV emerged from its supposed hibernation before they prescribed antiviral drugs. The idea was to conserve forces until the patient&#x27;s immune system really needed help because the virus would often become resistant to the drugs. So it was generally thought wiser to wait until patients were far along in their illness.<p>&gt;&gt; Ho and Perelson turned this picture upside down. There was no hibernation. HIV and the body were locked in a pitched struggle every second of every day, and the immune system needed all the help it could get and as soon as possible after the critical early period of infection. And now it was obvious why no single medication worked for very long. The virus replicated so rapidly and mutated so quickly, it could find a way to escape almost any therapeutic drug.<p>&gt;&gt; Perelson&#x27;s mathematics gave a quantitative estimate of how many drugs had to be used in combination to beat HIV down and keep it down. By taking into account the measured mutation rate of HIV, the size of its genome and the newly estimated number of virus particles that were produced daily, he demonstrated mathematically that HIV was generating every possible mutation at every base in its genome many times a day. Because even a single mutation could confer drug resistance, there was little hope of success with single-drug therapy. Two drugs given at the same time would stand a better chance of working, but Perelson&#x27;s calculations showed that a sizable fraction of all possible double mutations also occurred each day. Three drugs in combination, however, would be hard for the HIV virus to overcome. The math suggested that the odds were something like 10 million to one against HIV being able to undergo the necessary three simultaneous mutations to escape triple-combination therapy.<p>&gt;&gt; When Ho and his colleagues tested a three-drug cocktail on HIV-infected patients in clinical studies in 1996, the results were remarkable. The level of virus in the blood dropped about 100-fold in two weeks. Over the next month it became undetectable.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;scientificamerican.express.pugpig.com&#x2F;2019&#x2F;03&#x2F;13&#x2F;how-calculus-was-the-unsung-hero-in-the-fight-against-hiv&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;scientificamerican.express.pugpig.com&#x2F;2019&#x2F;03&#x2F;13&#x2F;how...</a>
krisalty将近 6 年前
I think the scare of the HIV epidemic in the 90s is gone. Just from looking at how we have progressed thus far, just looking at HIV medication alone, gives me hope against news like this. Resistance will happen, but we will always outsmart it.
himlion将近 6 年前
Probably because homosexuality doesn&#x27;t fit their 19th century worldview
评论 #20582141 未加载
评论 #20581039 未加载
wtdata将近 6 年前
PrEP has negative side effects (besides being quite expensive for the state), condoms on the other side, don&#x27;t have side effects, and are cheap.<p>It&#x27;s a matter of having some sense of personal responsibility really.
评论 #20583594 未加载
评论 #20583570 未加载
评论 #20584947 未加载
评论 #20583856 未加载