TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Why Is Linux Preferred over FreeBSD (Or *BSD/Solaris/Illumos) for Web Serving?

2 点作者 neelc将近 6 年前
Looking at Netcraft&#x27;s August 2019 report:<p>&gt; Netflix chose FreeBSD for its balance of stability and features (as did Netcraft once upon a time), but it is becoming an increasingly less common frontend operating system on the web as a whole. Only 60,200 (0.67%) web-facing computers are running FreeBSD today.<p>Source: https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.netcraft.com&#x2F;archives&#x2F;2019&#x2F;08&#x2F;15&#x2F;august-2019-web-server-survey.html<p>In fact, a bigger percentage of Tor relays run FreeBSD than web servers.<p>While many of the open-source server-side web components support FreeBSD (not all, thanks Docker), almost everyone running an open-source web stack (as opposed to Microsoft&#x2F;.NET) runs Linux instead of BSD&#x2F;Illumos. Why? Bigger community? Docker? Better cloud support?<p>I&#x27;m only talking about the web, not every single app running on OSS (FreeBSD is prevalent on firewalls and network&#x2F;storage appliances).

2 条评论

zzzcpan将近 6 年前
FreeBSD doesn&#x27;t have as much funding, resources as Linux and therefore is always behind on various things. This pushes people to switch to Linux for one reason or another even if initially they were using FreeBSD and also pushes software developers to neglect FreeBSD, not providing proper support and giving even more reasons to switch. Like memory compression stuff on Linux that FreeBSD is behind on or Golang, while claiming FreeBSD support, not actually doing it all that well.
ntw1103将近 6 年前
I can only. speak to companies I&#x27;ve worked at, but their reason is docker.