TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

One Billionaire Could Keep Three Countries Hooked on Coal for Decades

42 点作者 abhikarthick将近 6 年前

4 条评论

spodek将近 6 年前
&gt; <i>When the vote came on May 18, it was not, as some had predicted, a watershed climate change election. Australians, especially in coal country, voted to keep the incumbent conservative coalition in power.</i><p>&gt; <i>Within days, the Carmichael mine had new momentum.</i><p>One billionaire plus the Australian voting majority.<p>People like to say and act like, &quot;Oh, I&#x27;m one person, what I do doesn&#x27;t matter,&quot; but that&#x27;s rationalizing the decision not to act. Individual behavior makes a difference. I don&#x27;t just mean using less air conditioning to conserve power, though that matters too. People can influence and lead each other.
评论 #20714107 未加载
5822130027将近 6 年前
According to Mark Blyth ( Prof. of political economy at Brown ).<p>India is going to continue to build 200 more coal powered plants despite knowing exactly how awful climate change is going to be for India.<p>Pakistan is following similar strategy.<p>The idea is that Europe&#x2F;US have more to lose due to climate change, so when time comes they can use these coal fired plants as a bargaining chip (&quot;bribe&quot;) for technology transfer, better trade deals, etc.<p>I do not agree or disagree with his assessment, it could very well be true.<p>But if you are India, spending MORE money to fix climate change wont make much of a difference as the biggest polluters are US &#x2F; CHINA &#x2F; EU.<p>So a MAD type strategy makes sense from their perspective.
评论 #20714064 未加载
评论 #20714603 未加载
评论 #20714161 未加载
评论 #20714101 未加载
评论 #20715182 未加载
cmroanirgo将近 6 年前
Many here may not realise that there&#x27;s massive problems with this crackpot deal cooked up by our politicians: It&#x27;s actually &#x27;protected&#x27; by Indigenous (Aboriginal) Land Rights.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wanganjagalingou.com.au&#x2F;our-fight&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wanganjagalingou.com.au&#x2F;our-fight&#x2F;</a><p>&gt; <i>We do hereby firmly REJECT a Land Use Agreement with Adani for the Carmichael mine on our traditional lands.<p>We DO NOT consent to the Carmichael mine on our ancestral lands.<p>We DO NOT accept Adani’s “offers” to sign away our land and our rights and interests in it. We will not take their “shut up” money.<p>We will PROTECT and DEFEND our Country and our connection to it. </i>
kristianp将近 6 年前
Apparently the profitability of the future Adani mine in Queensland will not be assured [1], however I would guess the coal power plants Adani owns will make up for that.<p>How can India meet the Paris agreement[2] while letting Adani build new coal power plants?<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.smh.com.au&#x2F;business&#x2F;companies&#x2F;the-numbers-on-adani-simply-don-t-add-up-20190524-p51qoy.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.smh.com.au&#x2F;business&#x2F;companies&#x2F;the-numbers-on-ada...</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;List_of_parties_to_the_Paris_Agreement" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;List_of_parties_to_the_Paris...</a>