TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

A 127-year-old physics riddle regarding the Kelvinangle in boat wakes solved

102 点作者 Errorcod3将近 6 年前

5 条评论

ramshorns将近 6 年前
&gt; <i>&quot;Fuel consumption can double if the vessel is traveling downstream compared to upstream,&quot; Ellingsen said.</i><p>This is counterintuitive. The fact that it&#x27;s easier to make waves traveling upstream must outweigh the fact that if you&#x27;re going downstream the water, you know, carries you.
评论 #20776489 未加载
评论 #20781880 未加载
评论 #20780525 未加载
评论 #20781313 未加载
davidhyde将近 6 年前
Can someone please explain to me why this is so groundbreaking? If I blow a smoke ring and there is no wind my smoke ring stays circular. If there is wind blowing from the side my smoke ring will become distorted. Likewise if there is a current in water then I expect that current to disturb the propagation of waves moving through the water, not so? The medium in which the wave is propagating is itself moving.<p>Surely this has not remained a mystery for 127 years.
评论 #20776002 未加载
评论 #20776003 未加载
评论 #20776056 未加载
评论 #20777468 未加载
ragazzina将近 6 年前
Other interesting physics riddles solved after some time:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Feynman_sprinkler" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Feynman_sprinkler</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Blackbird_(land_yacht)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Blackbird_(land_yacht)</a><p>And the infamous plane on a treadmill..
horsawlarway将近 6 年前
I hate the way this article is presented.<p>It takes an interesting and intuitive effect that we couldn&#x27;t explain mathematically and now can, and tries as hard as possible to shove every fucking clickbait word in as possible.<p>Kudos to the author for presenting this material in possibly the least consumable way imaginable. I hate it.
alok99将近 6 年前
I understand that there is now proof of the usual V-shaped wake angle not always being ~39 degrees depending on subsurface currents.<p>I&#x27;m a bit confused about the ring waves part of this article. How is the boat leaving a ring wave when it moves? Or is the boat just being lowered into the water to form a ripple? You can&#x27;t tell this from the top-down view.<p>For some reason, the way that the article was written made it seem that a boat moving through the water could leave an off-center ring wave wake, which makes no sense.
评论 #20780592 未加载