TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Which California waters are listed as impaired for fish consumption?

46 点作者 HillaryBriss将近 6 年前

8 条评论

pwarner将近 6 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Mercury_contamination_in_California_waterways" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Mercury_contamination_in_Calif...</a>
评论 #20758583 未加载
评论 #20759443 未加载
kbenson将近 6 年前
That&#x27;s distressing. My own city&#x27;s creek system is shown to have Mercury.
评论 #20758375 未加载
smhinsey将近 6 年前
For what it&#x27;s worth, not all of these areas are totally unsafe. I am familiar with some of the central valley lakes that are highlighted and I grabbed the current consumption flyer for one: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;oehha.ca.gov&#x2F;media&#x2F;downloads&#x2F;advisories&#x2F;millertonlakeposter.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;oehha.ca.gov&#x2F;media&#x2F;downloads&#x2F;advisories&#x2F;millertonlak...</a><p>The situation is not great but it&#x27;s not quite so bad as it might seem if you look at that map and think it indicates only areas where fish are completely unsafe to eat.
jihadjihad将近 6 年前
This is neat (and disturbing), but I don&#x27;t live in California. Does anyone happen to know of similar sources for other states&#x2F;regions?
saagarjha将近 6 年前
It looks like much of the water in the Bay Area is listed as impaired, sadly…
评论 #20758650 未加载
评论 #20759084 未加载
TomMckenny将近 6 年前
Scenic LA River isn&#x27;t listed! Woot! &#x2F;s
darksaints将近 6 年前
WARNING: The State of California contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm.
squirrelicus将近 6 年前
I&#x27;m not sure this map is trustworthy given CA&#x27;s propensity to label everything under the sun as unsafe. I bought a turning signal to fix my grandpa&#x27;s boat trailer and it had the famous CA cancer advisory. Crying wolf, man.<p>How about this: is the turning signal more likely to give you cancer than living with an indoor smoker? Unlikely. And yet living with secondhand smoke is associated with a ~20% increase in risk, i.e. from ~6% lifetime risk to ~7.2% lifetime risk