TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Shipping wind turbines is not a breeze

99 点作者 watchdogtimer超过 5 年前

8 条评论

philipkglass超过 5 年前
This is a good read. The difficulty of transporting large wind components over land is one reason that onshore wind turbines have lower maximum capacities vs. offshore turbines. The largest onshore turbine is 5.3 megawatts [1] while the largest offshore turbine is 9.5 megawatts [2]. Transporting super-large components by sea is easier -- no tunnels, bridges, or winding roads to worry about.<p>Very tall turbines tend to improve capacity factor and project economics by tapping steadier winds found further away from the ground. For onshore projects, at least, that benefit is in tension with the more difficult transport and assembly logistics noted in this article.<p>Solar has the logistics edge in that all of the components for a solar farm are much smaller and weigh less. Even the largest individual solar modules are under 40 kilograms each. Racking systems are also assembled out of smaller pieces. No oversized loads need to be transported to the solar farm site. There are more truckloads of components for a 400 megawatt solar farm vs. a 400 kilowatt farm, but the individual components and trucks need be no larger.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.genewsroom.com&#x2F;press-releases&#x2F;ges-largest-onshore-wind-turbine-prototype-installed-and-operating-netherlands" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.genewsroom.com&#x2F;press-releases&#x2F;ges-largest-onshor...</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wind-turbine-models.com&#x2F;turbines&#x2F;1605-mhi-vestas-offshore-v164-9.5-mw" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wind-turbine-models.com&#x2F;turbines&#x2F;1605-mhi-vestas-...</a>
评论 #20824972 未加载
评论 #20825123 未加载
评论 #20824187 未加载
评论 #20827259 未加载
评论 #20824160 未加载
评论 #20825879 未加载
directionless超过 5 年前
Y&#x27;all may be interested in <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;keystonetowersystems.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;keystonetowersystems.com&#x2F;</a><p>They&#x27;re a small company that uses a neat system to manufacture the towers onsite, cutting down the shipping for it.<p>(Disclosure -- they&#x27;re friends of mine, but I have no direct experience with them)
csours超过 5 年前
Someone on the site asks about helicopters and I wonder the same thing. I know helicopters are hellishly expensive to use, but they are used occasionally - eg for ski lifts.<p>Helicopter Installs Ski Lift Towers at a Private Ski Club: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=83MPTPNXhTs" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=83MPTPNXhTs</a>
评论 #20826303 未加载
latchkey超过 5 年前
Watching wind turbines fail on youtube is kind of entertaining. Some of the videos are really quite spectacular.
michaelwilson超过 5 年前
I wonder if the same technology used to make folder fight jet wings ( so they can store more on an aircraft carrier) could be applied here?
评论 #20825525 未加载
dawnerd超过 5 年前
The show Outback Truckers did a little segment when one of the drivers had to deliver one <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=TiRkiNh7VK0" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=TiRkiNh7VK0</a>
JohnJamesRambo超过 5 年前
Stupid question but is there a market for lots of smaller wind turbines? What’s the efficiency like vs. one big turbine? Is there something like a solar farm with modular panels, but for wind?
评论 #20826994 未加载
jakeogh超过 5 年前
A lot for a few MW: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=0Di9g3Lc474" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=0Di9g3Lc474</a>
评论 #20825835 未加载