I am a software engineer myself have seen a recurring pattern. A lot of software engineers talk a lot more than required about a technical subject/work project with technical and non technical people. Also, over complicate things and are not to the point. I also think, this is my personal opinion that the smarter the engineer thinks he is, the more he will talk and will use a lot more words and ideas to explain a simple concept and is not really as bright as he thinks he is
Because for engineering, the eye-glazing details make-or-break things.<p>To distill the information usefully requires getting into your audience’s frame of mind.<p>Knowing what they intend to do with that information.<p>And knowing how much detail can be omitted without conveying misinformation.<p>I imagine science journalists face the same dilemma.
The engineers I know and work with tend to keep talking to a minimum. The smartest of them often forget to explain concepts to us mere mortals in their quest for short, simple information transfer.<p>I guess what I'm saying is that you can't generalize your very limited experience to all software engineers.
Verbosity stemming from a natural desire for recognition is a modern social
phenomenon not exclusive to programmers. Nothing we read, whether the New
Yorker, Stack Overflow, medium.com, or reddit, needs to be as long as it is.
I'd say verbosity is as much an existential threat as climate change.