It's been pulled so here's a wb link for the curious like myself.<p><a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20190906122433/https://gist.github.com/djspiewak/39fcf30fc4480abb5096010886558792" rel="nofollow">http://web.archive.org/web/20190906122433/https://gist.githu...</a>
So, I have just read the post.<p>And I don't want to be <i>that</i> guy, but why is this on the FP?<p>edit : I will rephrase : why is this interesting?
How was this whole thing written without using the verb "sealioning"?<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning</a>
Official announcement:<p><a href="https://typelevel.org/blog/2019/09/05/jdg.html" rel="nofollow">https://typelevel.org/blog/2019/09/05/jdg.html</a>
see also from Skills Matter: <a href="https://skillsmatter.com/go/03092019" rel="nofollow">https://skillsmatter.com/go/03092019</a>