TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

WeWork to List Shares on Nasdaq, Make Governance Changes

49 点作者 dawhizkid超过 5 年前

10 条评论

vadym909超过 5 年前
I can guess (however unlikely it may be) how Uber might some day make money through its monopoly power or use of autonomous cars and justify its valuation. I just can't imagine how WeWork could continue growing and turn a profit if it can't do it in this booming economy. The freelancers and small businesses that use it are likely the first to end their memberships and work from home or coffee shops.
评论 #20960452 未加载
评论 #20959862 未加载
评论 #20962016 未加载
评论 #20962034 未加载
评论 #20960153 未加载
Huxley-Luke超过 5 年前
I don't understand the hype around WeWork. Nothing it does is innovative or different. Its strategy and product can be easily replicated by anyone with enough cash to burn. It seems less like a business and more like a rent-seeking scam to loot money from investors until they've sold to the greatest fool they can find.
评论 #20965137 未加载
jpeg_hero超过 5 年前
&gt; speeds up preparations for its hotly anticipated initial public offering in the face of tepid interest from investors.<p>God, tell me the editor was asleep. Tell me how it can both be “hotly anticipated” yet with “tepid interest.”<p>Brain hurts.
评论 #20960002 未加载
评论 #20960092 未加载
评论 #20960684 未加载
评论 #20959953 未加载
评论 #20959970 未加载
评论 #20959968 未加载
jarym超过 5 年前
WeWork are quite expensive - enough that startups will get their own offices when they reach some stability. So I’m left wondering, WeWork charge a lot and in turn they pay a huge premium for their building leases. How are they NOT making money?
评论 #20960941 未加载
评论 #20960769 未加载
paxys超过 5 年前
&quot;Sweeping changes&quot; is mentioned in the first line of the article but nowhere else. What exactly are they planning to change?
评论 #20960189 未加载
ganitarashid超过 5 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Greater_fool_theory" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Greater_fool_theory</a>
wwthrowaway超过 5 年前
Converting a capital intensive and inflexible office lease commitment to monthly payments and the ability to scale is very useful to many companies that manage their real estate prudently.<p>WW could be successful without all the rah-rah about changing the world. Like Uber, I’m sure they could afford to shed a few thousand employees (who were hired for growth) and continue to run a more sustainable business.
评论 #20961984 未加载
jannes超过 5 年前
&gt; We waited an unusually long time to decide on an exchange.<p>Sentences like these make skimming pretty hard. It made me re-read the entire article because I was confused about the who is the author.
amoitnga超过 5 年前
From a point of view of a regular human, how is WeWork good for me?<p>I&#x27;m generally opposed to 1 company to &quot;rule them all&quot;, and I would like to see giants to be broken down.<p>In case of say, Amazon, at the very least being so huge may allow (arguably) for cheaper prices and almost everything in one place, delivered conveniently. suppose that&#x27;s true.<p>How one company owning a lot of real estate is good for me? The way I see it, if they are successful, they will spend less while charging more, even further accumulating wealth among the smaller amount of ppl. I don&#x27;t see how it&#x27;s good for most of us.<p>They aren&#x27;t developing real estate market. They aren&#x27;t creating new ways of building more efficiently. They aren&#x27;t doing anything other than using huge sums of money to generate more money.
评论 #20961915 未加载
评论 #20961772 未加载
GoodGOYIM超过 5 年前
Congratulations WeWork! Remember: Haters gonna hate.
评论 #20961009 未加载
评论 #20960608 未加载