TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How Bitcoin Ends

25 点作者 dpapathanasiou超过 5 年前

8 条评论

tristanho超过 5 年前
This article makes pretty blatant errors:<p>&gt; We thought the net would break the monopoly of top-down, corporate media. But as business interests took over it has become primarily a delivery system for streaming television to consumers, and consumer data to advertisers.<p>Weird thing to say about an era where traditional publishers and news networks have been entirely disrupted by random folks posting on twitter&#x2F;facebook.<p>&gt; At its core, bitcoin is just an extension of the old PGP, or Pretty Good Privacy encryption protocol.<p>I&#x27;ve never seen the word &quot;just&quot; do so much work. Bitcoin, notably, solved the Double Spending problem[0] seventeen years after PGP was created.<p>&gt; In essence, bitcoin is money built and maintained by nerds, based on the premise that good nerds will outnumber the bad nerds.<p>This is patently false. The _entire_ point of bitcoin is that miners and node operators acting in _their own self-interest_ will secure the protocol, not &quot;good nerds&quot;. You can argue if the system fails this will be the case, but not that this is the premise.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Double-spending" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Double-spending</a>
评论 #21032369 未加载
评论 #21032618 未加载
shiado超过 5 年前
I have no doubt that Bitcoin will end someday, most likely from QC breaking ECDSA, but this is perhaps the most illiterate and uninformed takedown I have ever read on the subject.
评论 #21032404 未加载
评论 #21032583 未加载
quocble超过 5 年前
Aside from the flaws of the article, there are something to be said about how centralized bitcoin has become. Most of the bitcoins are held by centralized exchanges, or &quot;qualified&quot; custodian (locked up in ETF and other exchanges). They essentially act like centralized banks, the exact thing we&#x27;re trying to avoid. The only saving grace is we can send to native wallet, giving us some freedom from the institutions.
HashThis超过 5 年前
This is how Bitcoin ends up...<p>* Bitcoin and Ethereum are grandfathered into not requiring KYC and AML. They are the rare currency with zero friction.<p>* All new currencies require KYC and AML. This is happening right now<p>* Other currencies can have some positives (backed by revenue generating assets, etc.). But they can be confiscated by governments<p>* Bitcoin always has a place, as the zero friction, no-KYC currency.<p>EXAMPLE: I did a wire transfer from the USA to India. Since it was sent in Indian rupees, the receiving bank kept rejecting it. They claimed it didn&#x27;t pass AML. The real reason is that they wanted to take huge fees for the USD to Rupees conversion on their receiving side. So they kept rejecting it, until it is sent in US Dollars and they can scalp me on the conversion rate. I had 8 weeks of failed transfers.<p>That AML hostage taking can happen across all currencies BUT Bitcoin and Ethereum.<p>In the future, people in China are taking their money out in bitcoin. People across Africa, South America, also often move it into Bitcoin. They can cross justidictions with nobody to stop them. There is a place to cut around the hostage stakers at the AML level.
评论 #21032268 未加载
TooSmugToFail超过 5 年前
So much nonsense in this article, don&#x27;t know where to start...
评论 #21034122 未加载
basicplus2超过 5 年前
This is also about getting out of being &quot;locked into&quot; a larger overall economy run for the benefit of a few and creating local economies.<p>People with land and&#x2F;or skills could create new economies by trading directly with each other with what they produce and opt out altogether..<p>In a way it is the final defence of a people against control and oppression or insane hyperinflation, but is more dificult to do if you are stuck in a city or additcted to modern technology.
anm89超过 5 年前
Are they trying to say Bitcoin will not remain a totally unregulated, totally compromised and idealistic cryptoanarchocapitalist utopia forever? Are they trying to say that Bitcoin won&#x27;t solve all of the world&#x27;s problems and bringing on a new utopian era??<p>I refuse to believe it. Because if that were true bitcoin would surely vanish into thin air.
Sargos超过 5 年前
This article makes a good case about Bitcoin but even the original Bitcoin enthusiasts and crypto community as a whole has admitted that it was a great experiment but is now obsolete and settling in for a temporary (years) store of value role.<p>I would like to see these same discussions after understanding the Ethereum ecosystem which solves most of the problems listed in articles like these. There&#x27;s a stable form of value in DAI, high velocity and cheap money transfers, and decentralized financial protocols that replace traditional gatekeepers like banks and payment processors.<p>A long but interesting article by David Hoffman really sums it up in the best way possible and is worth a read: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;thedefiant.substack.com&#x2F;p&#x2F;ether-is-the-best-model-for-money" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;thedefiant.substack.com&#x2F;p&#x2F;ether-is-the-best-model-fo...</a>