50 years of failed doomsday, eco-pocalyptic predictions

Focus on the worst mistakes of your opponents, and ignore their stronger arguments. Notably absent from that page is <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;berkeleyearth.org&#x2F;global-temperatures-2017&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;berkeleyearth.org&#x2F;global-temperatures-2017&#x2F;</a> and especially this graph: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;berkeleyearth.org&#x2F;wp-content&#x2F;uploads&#x2F;2018&#x2F;01&#x2F;LongtermTrend2017-1024x582.png" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;berkeleyearth.org&#x2F;wp-content&#x2F;uploads&#x2F;2018&#x2F;01&#x2F;Longterm...</a><p>But I&#x27;m sure if we focus hard enough on what they got wrong, we can ignore that for another decade or two.

It&#x27;s notable that the author selected articles written by non-scientists intended for consumption by general audiences. I encourage readers to question the author&#x27;s intent as they read through his curated list of sensational articles and compare their content to scholarly articles published in authoritative scientific journals.