I’m going to just pull from two of Maciej Cegłowski‘s tweets on this article (@Pinboard on Twitter, idlewords here):<p>> This is a really tendentious article by the New York Times that makes me question their other Hong Kong coverage. The story the past week isn't an increase in violence by protesters against people; it's a police rampage in which cops shot two schoolkids.<p>> There is incredible journalism being done here, including by
@nytimes
reporters, but what reaches the front page is bad. David Brooks bullshit, articles like this on "escalating violence", descriptions of emergency law as a "measured step". And we have no public editor to turn to<p>Both from this thread: <a href="https://twitter.com/Pinboard/status/1181240398603112449" rel="nofollow">https://twitter.com/Pinboard/status/1181240398603112449</a>