TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Backblaze 7.0 – Version History and Beyond

162 点作者 mrchucklepants超过 5 年前

12 条评论

renaudg超过 5 年前
In case someone at Backblaze is reading this : I had a less than ideal experience in the past couple of days, trying to report through normal support channels a potentially critical bug breaking the &quot;inherit backup&quot; feature in the Mac client.<p>Here goes : a few days ago the Backblaze Mac client started prompting me to upgrade urgently to the latest version (6.1.0.370). I went ahead and did that but got &quot;Installation could not complete, please contact support&quot; each time. Support advised me to wipe &#x2F;Library&#x2F;Backblaze* , reinstall, then inherit the existing backup.<p>Well, we never managed to get the inherit process to complete : it failed with &quot;ERR_error_unknown&quot; every time. And I started freaking out.<p>That&#x27;s where things get interesting : I became frustrated with the canned responses from support and decided to delve into the client logs myself. I quickly found a potential smoking gun (in bzbmenu.log) : a spelling mismatch in an XML attribute name between the server response (support_inherit=&quot;true&quot;) and what the client was expecting (&quot;ERROR could not read attribute named supports_inherit&quot;). Notice the extra &quot;s&quot; ? Pretty obvious typo and one that could definitely explain the failure (client can&#x27;t confirm that the selected backup is eligible for inheritance, bails out)<p>I was rather happy with my findings and shared them in plenty of details with support (including log excerpts), but instead of a &quot;thank you and here&#x27;s some free months of service !&quot; response, I got &quot;meh, this log file is irrelevant&quot;, and worse: no promise to escalate the issue (until I insisted a second time). They suggested updating to the 6.1.0.372 beta, which turned out to have the exact same bug.<p>Now, I&#x27;m left wondering if should try upgrading to 7.0 and inheriting my 6.1 backup from there. But the point of this message is to share my disappointment with this support experience. I went out of my way as a customer and spent a couple of hours researching and finding something potentially useful to the company, but had no appropriate way to report it. I even tried security contacts, but was (rightfully) told it wasn&#x27;t a security issue. No word on whether they were going to pass it on to the relevant team.<p>EDIT: I&#x27;ve just confirmed that the same issue is present in 7.0.0.386. Still can&#x27;t inherit my existing backup.
评论 #21195826 未加载
评论 #21196145 未加载
评论 #21198528 未加载
评论 #21196518 未加载
Trias11超过 5 年前
Are you (BackBlaze) still happily deleting user&#x27;s backup files if user&#x27;s computer does not contact BackBlaze servers within some arbitrary time?<p>Yes&#x2F;No?<p>Source: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;help.backblaze.com&#x2F;hc&#x2F;en-us&#x2F;articles&#x2F;217664898-What-happens-to-my-backups-when-I-m-away-or-on-vacation-" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;help.backblaze.com&#x2F;hc&#x2F;en-us&#x2F;articles&#x2F;217664898-What-...</a><p>This is malice.<p>If you are still doing this to your users - your service is a non-starter. Backup service that deletes user&#x27;s valuable files under some TOS excuse should not exist.
评论 #21200624 未加载
评论 #21204200 未加载
评论 #21200695 未加载
评论 #21199848 未加载
评论 #21205648 未加载
elfchief超过 5 年前
I&#x27;ve only ever had one problem with Backblaze, in my ... 7 or 8? ... years as a customer.<p>The problem: The UI for excluding directories is <i>horrific</i>. It uses the Windows &quot;Browse for Folder&quot; *SHBrowseForFolder) dialog, which requires you click down through each and every level of your directory structure to get to the directory you want to exclude. You can&#x27;t cut and paste, it doesn&#x27;t start from the directory you added your last exclusion in, it&#x27;s just lots and lots and lots and lots of clicking.<p>This doesn&#x27;t seem like it would be hard to fix, so I&#x27;m guessing they don&#x27;t consider it broken?<p>If the Backblaze folks are still reading: Could you please, pretty please, with sugar on top, for the love of god, fix your fucking exclusions interface? Please?
评论 #21198999 未加载
评论 #21200199 未加载
评论 #21204277 未加载
zomg超过 5 年前
i&#x27;ve been a customer of backblaze for a about a decade now. everyone has their opinion, but for me, it&#x27;s always just hummed along in the background, doing it&#x27;s thing. i&#x27;ve had to restore almost a terabyte of data (on more than one occasion, derp) -- and had no issues.<p>it&#x27;s up there (again, for me) as one of the annual software subscriptions that&#x27;s worth every penny, if not more.
评论 #21196418 未加载
评论 #21196097 未加载
评论 #21195455 未加载
评论 #21195069 未加载
maikhoepfel超过 5 年前
Cool changes! Any plans to ever add Linux support? That’s a dealbreaker for me. I need to backup both Linux and Windows machines. I wanted to use B2, but restic seems not ideal on Windows.
评论 #21195604 未加载
评论 #21197531 未加载
评论 #21200169 未加载
sanbor超过 5 年前
Any plans to restore an encrypted backup without having to send the private key to Backblaze servers?
评论 #21208897 未加载
ryanmercer超过 5 年前
I really miss Backblaze. I was a customer for years and years and actually was fortunate (I guess?) enough to have to use them to recover around a terabyte once but when I switched to using a Chromebox as my daily driver (then a Chromebox 2) I found I was turning my Windows machine on once a month just to keep kosher with the Backblaze servers.<p>Such a great service and I still always look forward to the emails, stuff like the drive failure rates is always a neat read!
评论 #21197449 未加载
tpmx超过 5 年前
Do they still have a very slow upload performance with their backup service? That&#x27;s been the main complaint I&#x27;ve been reading over the years. (I&#x27;d probably be happy with something in the range of 50-100 Mbit&#x2F;s.) (My home connection is 250&#x2F;100.)
评论 #21195068 未加载
评论 #21195446 未加载
评论 #21195558 未加载
semicolon_storm超过 5 年前
Very surprised it took this long to implement. I’ve had a good experience with B2B + Duplicati, but the main reason I went with that over the simpler Backblaze Cloud was the retention policy. 30 days to recover files was just too short of a time span to be a guarantee that my files were safe.
评论 #21194965 未加载
novok超过 5 年前
Does backblaze co. have access to the contents of your backups or is it client side encrypted?
评论 #21198544 未加载
CharlesW超过 5 年前
Yev, can you clarify whether this new release supports NAS? I see that it allows you to &quot;Back up all your attached external drives&quot;, but my drives happen to be connected via Ethernet.
评论 #21195198 未加载
评论 #21195625 未加载
jbergens超过 5 年前
Hm, if I turn on 1-year-history or history-forever and includes my node_modules folders in the backup will I fill their whole storage cluster?
评论 #21204300 未加载