Facebook could just ban political advertising for a year. They don't stand to lose a lot of money, just political influence. It would be a smart move though that would shut the mouths of their rivals in the press.
If the goal was just to make a point-- why not make some gonzo claim that virtually no one would believe and which wouldn't obviously benefit their campaign when anyone does believe it? Something along the lines of "Mark Zuckerberg pregnant with space alien baby!"<p>This seems like it's playing into the hands of political opponents who might accuse the campaign of being dishonest.
I'd think every politician is going to have a Facebook strategy. It probably aligns with age demographics.<p>They probably need Twitter, etc. for other demographics.
I'm surprised that Warren takes this approach. Did she or her campaign really think this trough?<p>It seems like Trump successfully turned 'fake news' into mush where people can't distinguish between different categories of speech. Even Dems get confused and can't think starting from first principles. They are asking FB to sensor political speech.