TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Craftsmanship – The Alternative to the Four Hour Work Week Mindset (2018)

143 点作者 rpkoven超过 5 年前

13 条评论

adim86超过 5 年前
I think the source of this issue is as recent as the industrial age. People grow up wanting to be "Managers". We grew up watching our parents have a skill and working at a corporation, but then looking for that promotion to become a Manager. Somewhere along the line people are like, why don't I skip the whole working my ass off part and just hack resources together and manage it (Especially with the rise of the startup life). We lost the notion that there is a value to hard work, that there is a value to failing and picking yourself up. This is further compounded by the corruption we see in our governments, societies and money markets where people move around shares and numbers on excel sheets and become millionaires. It feeds further into the idea that people who work hard or develop a skill are losers
Antoninus超过 5 年前
I'm not a great developer by today's measurements. I struggled throughout my degree and the first 4 years of my career. Especially, when it came to computer networking and algorithms. 7 years into this profession and few projects high-profile projects later, I feel like I'm just getting my legs going. What keeps me going is adopting the mindset that software development is a lifelong craft from posts like this and HN community.
评论 #21297197 未加载
agota超过 5 年前
&quot;4 hours work week&quot; mindset and a craftsman mindset are not at odds with each other.<p>If you can build a business that you can maintain in four hours a week while generating enough profit to pay the bills, why not?<p>That would free up a lot of time that you can then spend pursuing interests that are unlikely to ever pay the bills (mathematics, music, painting, creative writing, whatever).<p>If your business is a means to that end, are you still a hack or are you a craftsman?<p>This disdain for lifestyle businesses is absurd. It&#x27;s both sad and gross that some people are unable to see that it&#x27;s possible to have ambition that is not tied to making money. A lifestyle business can give you an experience similar to that of being independently wealthy.<p>It might be hard for some to imagine, but not everyone is an Elon Musk wannabe, there are people who see building a business as a means to an end, not an end in itself.<p>I understand that he didn&#x27;t address the scenario I propose, presumably because he can&#x27;t even conceive of it, but I don&#x27;t get the traveling the world criticism either.<p>I mean, I myself am very critical of the digital nomad lifestyle, but &quot;Spending time on something that you find enjoyable is professional malpractice&quot; is not among my list of criticisms.
rswail超过 5 年前
Appreciate the content, but not sure that &quot;craftsmanship&quot; is what is needed, it&#x27;s a &quot;generalist&quot; approach rather than &quot;specialist&quot; that entrepreneurs need.<p>Craftsmanship is about a dedication to a single activity, so a master cabinet maker, or a Wall St quant, or a &quot;rock star&quot; programmer (titles may vary).
评论 #21297033 未加载
评论 #21297797 未加载
TeMPOraL超过 5 年前
A question to HN: reading this and other discussions, it seems to me that &quot;craftsmen&quot; are being rated by how good a business they run (or are contributing to). Similarly with the word &quot;professional&quot;. I&#x27;d like to ask, what then would be the word for a &quot;craftsmen&quot; by rated how good <i>the work</i> is at its purpose (and without the usual cop-out of redefining &quot;good&quot; as value in dollars)?<p>Optimization for &quot;good work&quot; is only partially aligned with &quot;good business&quot;; frequently, the two are at odds. A good product, in my view, is one that lets the user achieve their goals as efficiently as possible, endures for as long these goals need to be achieved (often lifetime or more), and - after meeting these constraints - is also optimized to minimize the price and use of materials. It&#x27;s the kind of product that you buy once, are happy about it, and when you no longer need it, give or sell to someone else. It&#x27;s your grandfather&#x27;s watch, passed on to you by your parents, and who you&#x27;ll one day pass on to your kid. It&#x27;s the furniture you&#x27;ve inherited with the house that remembers World War II, but is still almost as good as new. It&#x27;s the forever repairable Soviet-era sound amplifiers or irons for clothes. It&#x27;s the web page your bank had three redesigns and two SPA frameworks ago.<p>A good &quot;professional&quot; would take a look at one of such products and declare them bad. Overengineered. Because what&#x27;s &quot;professional&quot;, what&#x27;s good for business, are products that break fast (ensuring recurring revenue) and are as cheap as possible to make. Do they solve 100% of the problems it was supposed to? Doesn&#x27;t have to, customers don&#x27;t know that when buying, and when they figure it out, it&#x27;ll be easier for them to learn to deal with missing part of functionality, or learn to be extra careful around the product, than it&#x27;ll be for them to spend money on something else. Whatever other defects there may be, we can cheaply cover for with sales&amp;marketing. What a &quot;professional&quot; does is ensures their work makes them (or their employer) maximum amount of money for minimum amount of effort.<p>So, HN, I&#x27;m looking for a word that describes the person, the art, of doing good work and good products, as defined above, in contrast to being a &quot;professional&quot;, which I increasingly despise of.
评论 #21298308 未加载
评论 #21298259 未加载
shartshooter超过 5 年前
becoming a craftsman and getting to the 99th percentile has major trade offs. In order to survive as a business you need to create value and capture the market faster than your competition can. To do that you need to do more than your <i>craft</i>.<p>You have to operate a business or you’ll get swallowed up by competition who doesn’t follow your mantra.<p>I also believe the cheapification of so much of society and the shallowness of so many companies means that people will be craving high quality, authentically produced goods and services.<p>In the long run quality may win out, but that’s if your competition doesn’t put you out of business before.
评论 #21297843 未加载
评论 #21298403 未加载
评论 #21301264 未加载
dang超过 5 年前
Discussed at the time: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=16248810" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=16248810</a>
cranium超过 5 年前
I tend to take this kind of article with a grain of salt, especially when there are definitive statements like: &quot;To be successful over the course of a career requires the application and accumulation of expertise&quot;. This idea that top-skills are required to succeed is comforting for us craftsmen and craftswomen but ultimately misleading because it forces us to only look for paths leading to skill improvements.<p>I strongly believe that success is mostly opportunity-driven. Exploring the search space to find the most opportunities (ie. the Ferriss way) or exploiting those available by putting the effort in (ie. the craftsmanship way) are two valid non-mutually exclusives strategies. As always, either of them can work but for the best result I believe a combination of the two will outperform any strategy applied narrow-mindedly. Now, for the mixing proportions...
vivekjuneja2010超过 5 年前
I like the author&#x27;s emphasis on taking one&#x27;s craft seriously, and pursuing curiosity as a means to build expertise in any domain of their choice. The interpretation of &quot;four hour work week&quot; is fragmented, and people choose the parts to retain what they think aligns closely to them or sometimes easy to adopt. To me, the essence of the the &quot;four hour work week&quot; is to look beyond traditional occupations and instil habits that allows one to optimize on their time while keeping a healthy work-life harmony. The take away for me is that hard work and dedication has no substitutes and one should not see &quot;hacks&quot; and &quot;shortcuts&quot; as a way to achieve long term success, but rather use them reasonably as a means to validate assumptions and pursue curiosity.
davidjnelson超过 5 年前
&gt; If you are to optimize for anything, optimize for the long term. Use the challenges of your business today to build mastery in your craft. There is no guarantee that any one venture will succeed, but that mastery will bend luck in your favor over the long course of your career.<p>I’ve found this has personally served me very well. Failed businesses and startups have indeed been great learning experiences. If you can keep a growth mindset and use cognitive tools to prevent rumination, it all just becomes more fuel to the fire that burns inside. Even if that simply means you are a more beneficial employee.
bondgaurav21超过 5 年前
This post really changed my mindset towards four hour work week mindset. But, I want to ask one thing from you which is- are you suggesting us to choose those entrepreneurial endeavors in which we have a huge desire to get an excellence instead of finding those ideas which are easy to setup and do not need so much knowledge crunching from our side?
kevintb超过 5 年前
Excellent article, thanks for posting.
jasonkester超过 5 年前
I guess if we&#x27;re going to discuss this article again, I should get to say my piece about it again:<p><i>&gt; To lounge on a beach or travel the world and not actively engage in building your arsenal of expertise is professional malpractice.</i><p>I&#x27;ve seen this thought expressed before in writing about Startups. If you&#x27;re not burning your life down 24&#x2F;7 in the struggle to make it Big, you&#x27;re doing it wrong.<p>But that&#x27;s silly.<p>The entire goal of building a business, in my mind, is to get the point where you can lounge on a beach or travel the world and not need to actively engage in anything except the pursuit of happiness.<p>I personally averaged out at a little less than four hours of work per week in 2017, running the sort of low maintenance, feature complete, Software-as-a-Service business that the author spends a paragraph explaining is not in fact a &quot;serious company&quot;.<p>But look at the product and you&#x27;ll see craftsmanship. Ten years of work, in fact as of roughly today. But never at the author&#x27;s pace. Always at mine. Those two things are not mutually exclusive.<p>That&#x27;s the great thing about building a business. You can do it any way you like.<p>[from <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=16248810" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=16248810</a>]
评论 #21297339 未加载
评论 #21297215 未加载
评论 #21297236 未加载
评论 #21297885 未加载
评论 #21298508 未加载
评论 #21297707 未加载