TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Friended is a new social network that wants to get real

95 点作者 nevaben超过 5 年前

28 条评论

Multicomp超过 5 年前
I like the idea, but 2 things.<p>1) where did they get the prices of $4.99 a week? Facebook&#x27;s average revenue per user per quarter is ~$25. That&#x27;s approximately $1.50 a week, for their most profitable section. Elsewhere, FB makes $6 ARPU per quarter, or around 37¢ a week. I&#x27;d be willing to pay $1 a month for a social network if it manages to get around the network effects etc. but ~$20(!) for something Facebook enables at no monetary cost? Yikes. But, I suppose that may just be the patreon effect.<p>2. Why is this iOS only? Limited resources excuses can be answered with &#x27;do a mobile web so all mobiles can&#x27;. Is it the &#x27;sometimes iPhone users tend to pay more for the same things Android users are too cheap to&#x27;?<p>I know the above can come off as somewhat harsh, but I do really like the business idea overall, I just want to discuss the implementation challenges.
评论 #21473516 未加载
评论 #21478186 未加载
评论 #21473943 未加载
评论 #21473514 未加载
评论 #21473872 未加载
评论 #21473442 未加载
评论 #21473411 未加载
评论 #21478904 未加载
评论 #21475418 未加载
评论 #21475722 未加载
评论 #21477708 未加载
评论 #21473695 未加载
monkeynotes超过 5 年前
&gt; No pressure, no public commenting and no rejection<p>Adults need to learn how to handle rejection. It&#x27;s so essential to learning how to be happy in the real world.<p>People who are lonely because they fear rejection need to fix the fear of rejection part before they will actually experience a real friendship. Being open with each other is essential to friendship, and being open risks rejection.<p>Friendship isn&#x27;t a individualistic pursuit, it involves multiple personalities and is full of risk and rejection. No reward without risk, contrary to what you might be sold on to mask your social anxiety.
评论 #21474877 未加载
评论 #21476723 未加载
BeerBear超过 5 年前
The Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory is nearly old enough to vote. (source for the uninitiated: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;knowyourmeme.com&#x2F;memes&#x2F;greater-internet-fuckwad-theory" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;knowyourmeme.com&#x2F;memes&#x2F;greater-internet-fuckwad-theo...</a>)<p>I don&#x27;t understand why the founders think &quot;this time will be different&quot;. The disconnection of digital communication makes it easier to be abrasive, even if real names are used and the comments are private. We have ample evidence of this from other platforms with direct messaging and identifiable individuals.<p>The majority of the messages will still be &quot;kill yourself, you [expletive, slur]&quot;. The rest will be spam.
评论 #21473635 未加载
moosey超过 5 年前
Why not just make it so that people that you don&#x27;t interact with get auto-unfriended over time. If you just post, post, post and have no meaningful relationship beyond parasocial bullshit, then in no time, you&#x27;d be removed from the networking system. With something like this, the network would no longer be a personal marketing system, but would actually only keep you with people that you actually interact with in meaningful ways over time, perhaps through event scheduling, and perhaps through conversation.<p>If you left for a long time, you&#x27;d come back to a friendless universe, sure, but only on the network. I guess that the ultimate goal of a network like this would be to get people off of it, which would be healthy for the individual, and bad for the company.<p>Oh well, there goes that idea.
评论 #21480523 未加载
pavel_lishin超过 5 年前
&gt; <i>Friended wants to give users a deeper and more meaningful connection to one another, which the company believes they crave.</i><p>&gt; <i>The idea is to give people a chance to share how they really feel in a vulnerable, one-to-one setting. In playing around with the app, I had conversations with people about how to make friends in NYC and why it sometimes feel like others don’t care about us as much as we care about them.</i><p>I&#x27;m a moderator for a city-specific subreddit, and we get _a lot_ of posts by people bemoaning the lack of personal connections, and seeking _deep friendships_. And I always tell them the same thing: <i>It. Takes. Time.</i><p>That&#x27;s it. There&#x27;s no shortcut. There is no short conversation you can have that&#x27;ll turn a stranger into the kind of friend they&#x27;re seeking. You can pay your five dollars a week to bare your soul to anonymous or pseudonymous users, but you need repeated human contact to form the basis for a friendship.<p>I&#x27;m glad they&#x27;re trying to solve a real problem, but I don&#x27;t think that &quot;penpals - but with money&quot; is it.
评论 #21474138 未加载
评论 #21474802 未加载
评论 #21474383 未加载
评论 #21475276 未加载
评论 #21474313 未加载
评论 #21474979 未加载
sorenn111超过 5 年前
Perhaps I may be very wrong, but the name of this network, &quot;Friended&quot;, comes from a term that Facebook turned into common vernacular. &quot;Friend me on Facebook&quot; or &quot;I friended you on Facebook&quot;. If you&#x27;re starting point is a term coined by your goliath competitor, I&#x27;d be concerned.
评论 #21476359 未加载
Bombthecat超过 5 年前
&gt; Right now, users can only post a conversation starter every eight hours. The premium tier, which costs $4.99&#x2F;week, allows users to post as frequently as they want, and also includes a few other premium features, like the ability to talk to people in your location.<p>Woah.. That&#x27;s really expensive...
评论 #21474299 未加载
amoitnga超过 5 年前
Installed.<p>uploaded a picture.<p>made a mistake of putting email instead of name.<p>Tried to change it - can&#x27;t<p>contacted support<p>got a notification: &quot;people think you might be bot&quot;<p>uninstalled.
LinuxBender超过 5 年前
Ages ago I ran a phpbb site that initially followed this concept, but being community driven (I may have been a bit too friction-less), it quickly evolved into a community driven fetish&#x2F;porn site. Every time I am tempted to create such a thing, I reflect back on how much work it was and lessons learned (about moderation requirements).<p>Hats off &#x2F; kudos to anyone that can run something like this successfully at scale, as it is a lot of work and you can&#x27;t make everyone happy. I hope it turns into something great.
评论 #21477284 未加载
Timberwolf超过 5 年前
If you take &quot;the idea is to give people a chance to share how they really feel in a vulnerable, one-to-one setting&quot; and replace &quot;one-to-one&quot; with &quot;small group&quot; then this feels very close to the way many people used LiveJournal at its peak. Maybe slightly different in that the one-to-one stuff wasn&#x27;t automated: people would have public posts in which they&#x27;d share more generic stuff, then curate private friend groups from people who responded in ways that suggested they would have empathy. These private networks would be where the more vulnerable things got shared and discussed.<p>Of course as a community it was much derided - teens and young adults finding their way in the world looked naive and emotionally immature from the outside - but it&#x27;s interesting seeing someone trying to bring that pre-Facebook sense of sharing with a small and sympathetic group back.
farazbabar超过 5 年前
About time. I have been working on a similar problem ever since I found out about the Saudi agent that was uncovering twitter user identities to the royals (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nbcnews.com&#x2F;tech&#x2F;security&#x2F;saudis-recruited-twitter-workers-spy-critics-saudi-regime-u-s-n1077881" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nbcnews.com&#x2F;tech&#x2F;security&#x2F;saudis-recruited-twitt...</a>). The main idea is to have zero knowledge for social graphs (both the connectivity and communication). The product behaves like a newsgroup clone with subscriptions and threads featuring zero knowledge (for host i.e. me and any other parties not subscribed&#x2F;authorized to the topic).
brenden2超过 5 年前
I wonder how much it costs to get a PR piece like this on TechCrunch. Does anyone know?
评论 #21476643 未加载
bobblywobbles超过 5 年前
I like the enthusiasm. It&#x27;s always a good idea to try and help solve the ever-present problem of &quot;I don&#x27;t have enough friends, I need more inter-personal connection.&quot;<p>Fundamentally, I believe we _can&#x27;t_ solve this problem through technology. I think it can be used to initiate the friendship, but never sustain it. I feel the problem is you can&#x27;t be vulnerable on a screen, it just never replicates the face-to-face interaction with someone else.<p>I&#x27;ve been there for many years looking for that online substitute, it just doesn&#x27;t ever fully work. However - I wish you luck on your network.
gnicholas超过 5 年前
The first-listed option in the account creation flow is to log in with Facebook. Since I&#x27;m trying this to get away from FB, I&#x27;m not going to do that. But then once I&#x27;ve created an account with email, there&#x27;s no way to put in any information that would help me connect with my existing friends. Why is there no way to indicate your university, employers, or location?
authoritarian超过 5 年前
Just what the world needs, another social network....
评论 #21476366 未加载
hemantv超过 5 年前
I feel like all the social network problem stems from posting only positive if we shared about overall we and everyone on the network will be much happier.<p>I thought about various mechanism to implements but nothing comes to mind that is good enough.<p>Example: Force user to maintain happy sharing vs sad sharing to at max 2:1 but now how do you figure out which ones are happy post and sad post.
Meerax超过 5 年前
From the TOS: &quot;2. MEMBERSHIP. To become a Member, you must log-in through Facebook which provides your “Account Credentials”, which you may not transfer to or share with any third parties.&quot;<p>Did anyone else see this? They can&#x27;t promise to not hand over info about you to interested 3rd parties if your account validation and login is based in Facebook. Right?
steven741超过 5 年前
This is a pretty good idea but, it&#x27;s monetization strategy probably isn&#x27;t inclusive enough. I find that a lot people on social media aren&#x27;t trying to make friends. They&#x27;re mainly just there for themselves or content. But, putting the focus on developing proper kinship seems like a step in the right direction.
pcora超过 5 年前
I just want to be reminded in a year if this still exists or has any real traction.
ctack超过 5 年前
What&#x27;s the X of Y here? Facebook of the church confessional booth :D
评论 #21473599 未加载
isaacgreyed超过 5 年前
I wonder if regardless of the design of the platform, if simply having this be the idea behind the network will attract the right people, and build the right community to make it work.
BEEdwards超过 5 年前
Can you search local and are these conversations encrypted? If so this is great for grey&#x2F;black market sellers.<p>In addition to the inevitable harassment, this could be it&#x27;s big money maker.
Endy超过 5 年前
My one gripe here is that it&#x27;s only available as an iOS program. I think it would be much more accessible if it had a web interface, or if it also had an Android program.
rolltiide超过 5 年前
I like the identification of a problem, the remaining problem is that its another social network<p>Would probably be better off Re-using Blind’s pitch
walrus01超过 5 年前
It&#x27;s unfortunate they couldn&#x27;t get the name&#x2F;domain&#x2F;trademark for Friendster
guskel超过 5 年前
How do brand new social media platforms like this gather so many users so quickly?
评论 #21476532 未加载
notadoc超过 5 年前
The world needs less digital &quot;social networking&quot;, not more of it.
darepublic超过 5 年前
I am your friend<p><i>slaps face</i> for real?<p>yes<p><i>slaps face again</i> really for real?<p>yes<p>Ok then