TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

List of Hoaxes on Wikipedia

181 点作者 1_over_n超过 5 年前

20 条评论

nemo1618超过 5 年前
I wonder if any of these are actually not hoaxes, but simply unverifiable or insufficiently notable. Quite a few of the hoax articles are bands, for example; isn&#x27;t it more likely that they were real, and only played a show or two in some backwater town, rather than being invented whole-cloth? Maybe someday there will be a &quot;List of Wikipedia articles that were considered hoaxes but were actually true.&quot;<p>This one is pretty hilarious though:<p>&quot;Fictitious claim that the founder of Orange Julius invented auto-cleaning spectacles, an inflatable shrimp trap, and a portable pigeon-bathing unit. Dairy Queen, which now owns Orange Julius, was fooled; the company based an entire ad campaign around the hoax and produced this video[1] about Julius Freed&#x27;s supposed inventions.&quot;<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;m.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Rj1Ts1X6Vt0" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;m.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Rj1Ts1X6Vt0</a><p>And this one seems to explain the origins of a lot of hoax articles:<p>&quot;After being repeated tens of times, sometimes by journalists and academics, the hoax was identified by EJ Dickson, one of its authors, turned journalist, who had written it as a joke with a friend while &#x27;stoned&#x27;.&quot;
评论 #21495199 未加载
评论 #21493503 未加载
评论 #21495676 未加载
评论 #21514491 未加载
评论 #21493969 未加载
评论 #21495352 未加载
dmix超过 5 年前
This one is interesting considering it almost became a &#x27;featured article&#x27;:<p>&gt; Bicholim conflict<p>&gt; Fictitious war between the Portuguese rulers of Goa and the Maratha Empire which supposedly took place from mid-1640 to early 1641. It was assessed as a good article in September 2007, but failed a featured article nomination the next month as page numbers were not provided for references. ShelfSkewed (talk · contribs) investigated these references in 2012 and found that the main works cited do not actually exist. One of the longest and most elaborate hoax articles on Wikipedia. Probably the only to have been assessed a good article.
aazaa超过 5 年前
&gt; One way to identify hoax articles included examining the article structure and content, its mentions in other articles on Wikipedia (i.e., embeddedness), and features of the editor who created the page. Specifically, hoax articles are likely to be longer than a legitimate article, less likely to have links to other Wikipedia articles, references, images, or other &quot;wiki-like&quot; markup, less likely to be mentioned in other Wikipedia articles before its creation, and more likely to be created by a new account with few to no other edits.<p>Wikipedia benefits from this kind of metadata. Earlier ages didn&#x27;t.<p>The large number of articles, some of them evading detection for many years, makes you wonder about the hoaxes that may have been perpetrated in earlier times, but are now accepted as fact.
评论 #21495158 未加载
评论 #21494083 未加载
bitwize超过 5 年前
This reminds me of the time someone tried to convince the fan community for <i>Inspector Gadget</i> of the existence of an entire <i>Gadget</i> animated series that never aired in America that centered around a romantic relationship between Gadget and another character of her own creation. She went to great lengths to forge evidence of the obscure cartoon&#x27;s existence, including creating screen shots in Photoshop, inventing fictitious voice actors with fictitious résumés involving voice work on <i>other</i> fictitious shows, and creating a large number of sockpuppet accounts supposedly of people who had seen or were fans of the fictitious show. Wikipedia and IMDB had listings for the series, before the hoax was exposed.<p>Oddly enough the &quot;Gadget hoax&quot; once had its own Wikipedia article, but that was deleted long ago, presumably for non-notability.
isostatic超过 5 年前
First hoax in the list, &quot;Fictitious biography about a Belgian painter&quot;.<p>It was in place for 13 years, 4 months<p>But the kicker?<p>&gt; Speedy deleted as &quot;G3: Blatant hoax&quot;<p>If that&#x27;s speedy, what&#x27;s slow!?
评论 #21492687 未加载
评论 #21492387 未加载
评论 #21492925 未加载
评论 #21495155 未加载
boznz超过 5 年前
Back in the early 80&#x27;s I regularly said I was an airline pilot or worked at NASA to impress girls in bars. My gran went to her grave proudly thinking I&#x27;d been up to space on a secret mission, and there are still a few people out in the world who will swear they met a real double-agent or the guy who designed the lotus esprit..<p>Harmless fun, but not really possible to get away with these days..<p>Damn you Google!
评论 #21495303 未加载
评论 #21495105 未加载
fenwick67超过 5 年前
The scariest one on here is the article on &quot;Bine&quot;, a &quot;Fictional ancient Akkadian demon&quot;, not just because it was up for over 12 years but it was republished somewhere else.<p>&gt; Despite having no sources, the hoax was included in Theresa Bane&#x27;s Encyclopedia of Demons in World Religions and Cultures, published by McFarland &amp; Company in 2012.
评论 #21493865 未加载
评论 #21493919 未加载
ebg13超过 5 年前
Most of these look exceptionally boring. If you want the good stuff in the wikivandalism genre, you want Bad Jokes And Other Deleted Nonsense: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Wikipedia:Silly_Things" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Wikipedia:Silly_Things</a>
评论 #21496015 未加载
toby-超过 5 年前
The length of time the &quot;Tim Verfaillie&quot; hoax stood unchallenged impressive - over 13 years.<p>The article&#x27;s author has few contributions, and hasn&#x27;t been active since 2006 (on the English Wikipedia, at least): <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Special:Contributions&#x2F;Bruges" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Special:Contributions&#x2F;Bruges</a><p>I wonder how many other hoax articles are out there, having existed for decades without proper verification or review.
Waterluvian超过 5 年前
My favorite hoaxes are ones that totally fool some entity that really should know better like the Time Magazine Marblecake hoax. It was fun reading the mini articles on each listed person, stretching a rationale for why they&#x27;re on the list. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;techcrunch.com&#x2F;2009&#x2F;04&#x2F;27&#x2F;time-magazine-throws-up-its-hands-as-it-gets-pwned-by-4chan&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;techcrunch.com&#x2F;2009&#x2F;04&#x2F;27&#x2F;time-magazine-throws-up-it...</a>
acqq超过 5 年前
I remember finding some physical constant in a Wikipedia article with more decimals than what I knew about. I&#x27;ve verified that and have found that these decimals were bogus, and existed there in the article for quite a while (e.g. two years).<p>I&#x27;ve never tried to right that wrong, believing it would take a lot of my energy.<p>Don&#x27;t believe Wikipedia blindly, even for the physical constants.
评论 #21495083 未加载
评论 #21495280 未加载
jonstewart超过 5 年前
I want to live in the alternate universe where Borges and Umberto Eco are still alive and use this phenomenon as inspiration.
rebuilder超过 5 年前
I went in looking for things I thought were real - the Spanish tickler is a hoax?
评论 #21495283 未加载
OJFord超过 5 年前
Most of them are bizarre in both subject matter and specificity (I suppose necessarily in order to get away with it) - I just don&#x27;t understand the motivation.
teh_infallible超过 5 年前
Whoever invented “Synchronized Football” deserves some kind of prize.
jonyt超过 5 年前
What about this fake Nazi death camp, apparently a hoax by Polish nationalists?<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.haaretz.com&#x2F;israel-news&#x2F;.premium.MAGAZINE-the-fake-nazi-death-camp-wikipedia-s-longest-hoax-exposed-1.7942233" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.haaretz.com&#x2F;israel-news&#x2F;.premium.MAGAZINE-the-fa...</a>
评论 #21492618 未加载
peteradio超过 5 年前
I&#x27;m so proud, my younger brother is the creator one of these when he was in middle school.
评论 #21494241 未加载
galaxyLogic超过 5 年前
SEEN: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.dw.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;putin-proposes-to-replace-wikipedia-with-reliable-russian-version&#x2F;a-51127214" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.dw.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;putin-proposes-to-replace-wikipedia-wi...</a>
mlthoughts2018超过 5 年前
This is really terrifying. Imagine what governments and elites could do across generations if they can popularize belief &amp; debate over entrenched hoax articles that shape debate over geopolitics.
评论 #21493186 未加载
评论 #21492763 未加载
评论 #21492664 未加载
评论 #21493099 未加载
jdavis703超过 5 年前
One of the hoaxes is about a &quot;fake&quot; mythical demon. At what point is mythology or a religion no longer considered a hoax?
评论 #21494976 未加载