TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Operating Manual for VC Firm Bloomberg Beta

77 点作者 pravj超过 5 年前

7 条评论

chrisaycock超过 5 年前
One of their investment paths is &quot;Beacon&quot;:<p>&gt; <i>We believe that there are exceptional individuals with great ideas who likely have the skills to build a company but lack the network or personal financial means to get started. So we will invest a small amount of capital -- $50K (for roughly 2% of the startup idea you pursue) -- to support very, very early-stage founders explore an idea, validate a key hypothesis, or build an early prototype.</i><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;Bloomberg-Beta&#x2F;Manual&#x2F;blob&#x2F;master&#x2F;1%20-%20Manual.md#beacon" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;Bloomberg-Beta&#x2F;Manual&#x2F;blob&#x2F;master&#x2F;1%20-%2...</a>
评论 #21554455 未加载
bhl超过 5 年前
It&#x27;d be nice if a majority of websites were exposed like this: if you wanted to save an article or blog-post for example, you could just fork it into a repository. What&#x27;s saved is just the original text, or anything that has a flat representation. Then you could edit and re-publish with changes; I think this is more in align with how knowledge works, sort of an implicit graph with splits and merges.<p>The basic idea is to separate the content from how it&#x27;s rendered (html, css, js). How content is rendered can be a repo-by-repo decision. Benefits of this is better portability of data and easier way to organize things on the internet: you wouldn&#x27;t have to web-scrape with some type of dom parsing heuristic library since the content is readily accessible.<p>It&#x27;s also feasible in implementation: plenty of people are publishing via Github pages and Jekyll; I just haven&#x27;t seen the ability to fork posts yet. Bloomberg Beta definitely could&#x27;ve done this for their website.
csomar超过 5 年前
Even better, they do share templates of some (I guess) of the legal documents: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;Bloomberg-Beta&#x2F;Investment-Documents" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;Bloomberg-Beta&#x2F;Investment-Documents</a><p>Very useful if you are into that stuff.
goog84329超过 5 年前
The average investment of $500,000 is way too small IMO. That&#x27;s less than the salary of one L5 (or L6?) engineer at Google.
评论 #21556753 未加载
评论 #21556725 未加载
buboard超过 5 年前
kind of funny that they all have twitter and linkedin links, but no github
Niyblinkz超过 5 年前
Connection is always needed to progress
gist超过 5 年前
&gt; We&#x27;ve moved our entire web presence to GitHub to become even more transparent. Here, you can see how things have changed over time, propose improvements, or even take our ideas and make them your own..<p>Sorry but to me this is screwy. Why do I have to spend time navigating github to find basic info about the firm if I am just curious? Why is it beneficial or implied that anyone who is anyone knows the secret handshake of finding what they need by finding it in this manner? Why is it not possible to have transparency with a &#x27;normal&#x27; website and then if there is a reason point people to github?<p>From wikipedia:<p>&quot;Bloomberg Beta consists of six full-time employees: Roy Bahat, Karin Klein, James Cham, Shivon Zillis, Morgan Polotan and Shaina Conners. Bahat was previously the President of IGN Entertainment and was the chairman of Ouya Inc. until June 2015.&quot;<p>The github site says nothing about who these people are either. Sorry they are not &#x27;well known enough&#x27; to present this way. This is not &#x27;everyone knows who Bill Gates is&#x27;.<p>Example: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;KarinK" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;KarinK</a><p>This is not transparency it is the opposite.
评论 #21555798 未加载
评论 #21555473 未加载
评论 #21555360 未加载