TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: do you ever clean your email marketing db from inactives?

8 点作者 federiconitidi超过 5 年前
I used to do periodically clean our email db by hand, but it quickly became time consuming, so I built an internal tool to easily run list cleaning in Mailchimp and other ESPs.<p>It&#x27;s pretty simple: it connects to the Mailchip API, looks at each contacts, identifies those inactive and either classify them in a special segment (e.g. &quot;Inactives&quot;) or archives them directly. It also reduces bounce rate since it checks the validity of all the new incoming emails (e.g. from mispellings in form submissions, spambots etc) before the first email goes out.<p>I&#x27;m now thinking whether it&#x27;s worth to launch this publicly. Would anyone else use this? How do you currently maintain email lists for your companies?<p>Thanks!

3 条评论

davismwfl超过 5 年前
I worked on CRM and Marketing automation software for quite a long time, and we always maintained lists by doing staged cleanings. We would place people in segments based on their interaction until we hit that point where we would move them to an inactive segment completely (but they may have gone through 10 segments first). We would occasionally target the inactive list with special offers but in general we didn&#x27;t do it with regularity. The lifecycle and journey of the email through different segments was really quite specific to the client type and the journey type.<p>So to answer your question more directly, it is a critical part of what people need to do to have proper response rates and to minimize issues with third party filtering systems. There is an absolute need for this type of stuff, I am just not sure if there is a large market opportunity here. Enterprises should be doing this already so you target would probably be SMB&#x27;s and other similar businesses, which means lots of work for low dollar sales most likely. Maybe I am wrong there, but that&#x27;s my initial thought.
评论 #21702885 未加载
theshadowknows超过 5 年前
List hygiene is important but from what I’ve seen most companies have their own way of handling it (or not handling it in many cases). For most orgs the platform defaults are good enough. What’s most important from my perspective is deactivation and also identifying when customers&#x2F;contacts switch either to a different channel or create new accounts with new contact info. That said there are already a handful of list hygiene tools in the space. But if your tool is compelling and you can figure out where to position it then sure it’s worth a shot.
评论 #21700927 未加载
ecf超过 5 年前
How about we stop giving the right to companies to immediately start email spam due to “required sign ins” for one time purchases?
评论 #21706420 未加载