TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

McKinsey Statement on NYT and ProPublica Article Regarding ICE and CBP

7 点作者 gmichnikov超过 5 年前

1 comment

sesuximo超过 5 年前
Their main defense is that Obama gave them their mission, and they&#x27;re just doing the same job under Trump.<p>&gt; As we have stated previously, the scope and goals of our work did not change in any material way from when the project was defined during the prior administration.<p>Perhaps that is a good response directly to the original article (which I have not read). But this defense is silly.<p>They should not continue to support a cause just because it used to be good. If it is now bad, and they still support it, then they support a bad thing. No matter what they claim their values are.<p>The correct thing to do would have been to stop working for ICE. ...or do it now
评论 #21719746 未加载