TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Auto-cpufreq – Automatic CPU speed and power optimizer for Linux

55 点作者 fooctrl超过 5 年前

6 条评论

rwem超过 5 年前
Seems to have some control loop deficiencies. If CPU utilization is ~50% then it will enable turbo and utilization will fall below 50% and then it will disable turbo again.
评论 #21963866 未加载
kylek超过 5 年前
Readme mentions the performance governor, don’t most distros default to ondemand these days?
评论 #21962073 未加载
评论 #21964985 未加载
nezirus超过 5 年前
A question for author (if he reads HN). What&#x27;s the difference between this tool and Intel&#x27;s thermald: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;intel&#x2F;thermal_daemon" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;intel&#x2F;thermal_daemon</a>
greatgib超过 5 年前
This tool is a great idea. On recent computers your only choices are: powersave or performance. That looks stupid compared to automatic CPU throttle that we had before. So, similar to the author of this tool, I also waste time to switch my computer from powersave to performance depending on my tasks and if keeping battery is critical or no. Like when traveling without power plug. Also, maybe I use it badly, but with cpufreq in have to manually change all the state of all cores individually and can do a single command to change all of them!
llampx超过 5 年前
I recently installed Ubuntu 19.10 on my Thinkpad and one of the first things I noticed was how bad battery life was. If this tool can help, it&#x27;ll be a godsend.
评论 #21961937 未加载
评论 #21961939 未加载
评论 #21962086 未加载
ncmncm超过 5 年前
I can&#x27;t find anything that even hints at what TLP is supposed to stand for. P = power, I can guess, and L = Linux, maybe. T?