TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

I didn't want to fly – so I took a cargo ship from Germany to Canada

47 点作者 nwrk超过 5 年前

6 条评论

gambiting超过 5 年前
I mean....yes. Yes, your carbon footprint is smaller by travelling slower. But you need to be in an extremely priviledged position to be able to afford travelling this way, both financially and time-wise. Cross-atlantic is obviously quite extreme, but even within Europe a train is not really a viable alternative for a lot of people, when I go to visit my family the choice is either a ~£100 Ryanair ticket for a 2 hour flight, or around 40 hour long train journey that will cost at least £500 one way. I just don't have the money or the time to travel this way. I don't know what's the right answer here - I suspect it is "just don't travel then".
评论 #21979583 未加载
评论 #21983258 未加载
评论 #21979180 未加载
评论 #21990064 未加载
jocoda超过 5 年前
&gt; ships rarely have room for more than a dozen passengers<p>Reason is that you need a ship&#x27;s doctor if there are more than 12 passengers.
flounder3超过 5 年前
There is no mention of the type of fuel the cargo ship burned while outside of port (bunker fuel, anyone?). The three citations at the end of the article simply reference generic sites, not specific information.
评论 #21978492 未加载
asdfadsfgfdda超过 5 年前
The carbon calculations seems questionable. The author should include all energy used on board the ship, which is entirely from fossil fuels. The energy required to desalinate seawater for drinking&#x2F;washing was probably greater than a flight.<p>Also, an additional, unnecessary person on the ship is slightly increasing the risk of diverting the ship because of a medical emergency. Imagine how much carbon would be burned if this massive ship had to turn around to drop off a sick passenger.
dsalzman超过 5 年前
Cargo ships are unregulated and burn the lowest grade oil called bunker fuel. These ships can emit the equivalent sulfur emissions of 19 million ICE vehicles.[1]<p>[1]<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cadmatic.com&#x2F;resource&#x2F;articles&#x2F;does-one-ship-pollute-as-much-as-50-million-cars-" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cadmatic.com&#x2F;resource&#x2F;articles&#x2F;does-one-ship-pol...</a>
评论 #21994347 未加载
ZeroGravitas超过 5 年前
Seems like offsetting would be easier?<p>That&#x27;s one of those economically sensible things that normal people dont seem to like though.
评论 #21980170 未加载