The real complaint here seems to be that the school didn't deliver on the type of education they promised (or seemingly any education at all). "Indentured servitude" is just a stupid way to describe the income-sharing agreement, the alternative to which is bearing all of the risk yourself in the form of student debt (or having education freely funded, but that's obviously not in the table for an individual).<p>There's plenty of basis for complaint here, and I hope it works out for her. But this title is clickbait nonsense about one bootcamp behaving badly in a way that has nothing to do with the ISA fee structure.