TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The NoSQL Dogma - Showing MySQL being as fast as NoSQL

2 点作者 faz超过 14 年前

2 条评论

forgotAgain超过 14 年前
How about just leave it at no dogma at all.<p><i>The technologies like HBase, Voldermort, CouchDB, and a huge list of others (each designed for a particular scenario) made me believe; that my favorite RDBMS MySQL has grown old and it can’t handle my data anymore.</i><p>Know yourself and know your data. Then just filter out what tools don't fit your needs. Don't blame others if you follow the crowds.
nika超过 14 年前
Call me a dog, but fast is not even on my list for reasons to choose a NoSQL solution (namely Riak)<p>1. Operations. I do not want to spend my time doing this, at all. 2. Linear Scalability. Scalability is not about performance for me, it is about being able to predict costs, and to grow capacity without downtime or high cost surprises. 3. Flexibility. The ability to work without having to fight a schema. No schema means no schema migrations (which goes to 1) but also no inherent assumptions in resource allocation. I've got a new idea that works a different way? Great, just add some new buckets and try it. No more ORM impedance mismatches, no dealing with arbitrary SQL vagueness. IF I don't like the mechanism for doing queries I can create a new solution. Map Reduce should be enough for everybody anyway. (joking!)