So while driving this morning, I had NPR on listening to US lawmakers give the typical run around about spending cuts. It seems like we are coming close to a dangerous stand still, which would obviously have dire consequences for the future of the US.<p>How come both sides can't seem to realize that when it comes to spending cuts EVERYTHING needs to get cut and unfortunately taxes need to be RAISED. No one wants to hear this - heck I don't want to pay more taxes. I also don't want to see gov agencies doing great things be cut severely, but the fact of the matter is that 14 trillion isn't going to go away quietly.<p>Now regardless of whether you think I am right or wrong in this assessment, I have continuously been impressed by the massive brain power behind HN and I am curious to hear people's thoughts on what needs to be done and why. If you are an international reader, feel free to share your outside perspective!
The interactive map doesn't allow one to account for increased economic growth. That's the argument behind supply side economics. There are two books that best lay out an approach to fix the budget deficit by cutting taxes. I know this sounds crazy, but I encourage everyone to give them a read. I've also included JFK's speech to the New York Economic Club (He'd be with Republicans today on fiscal issues). Even if you read them as a mental exercise, it will help you understand why Republicans advocate cutting taxes:<p>JFK's address to the New York Economic Club:<a href="http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/jfkeconomicclubaddress.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/jfkeconomicclubaddr...</a><p>Econoclasts by Brian Domitrovic: (This book shows why when Bush 43 cut taxes it didn't lead to growth. Mundell's policy mix is key) <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Econoclasts-Supply-Side-Revolution-Prosperity-Enterprise/dp/193519125X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1298048013&sr=8-1" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Econoclasts-Supply-Side-Revolution-Pro...</a><p>The Growth Experiment by Lawrence Lindsey
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Growth-Experiment-Policy-Transforming-Economy/dp/0465027512/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1298048203&sr=1-1" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Growth-Experiment-Policy-Transforming-...</a><p>I don't disagree that spending is the main culprit of the budget deficit, but there is a way out of our predicament that few if any are talking about. Historically tax revenue is equal to about 18% of GDP. So in order to have a balanced budget at 3.73 trillion we would need a GDP of 20.7 trillion . To balance our budget, assuming no growth in spending, it would take 7 years of 5% growth. It would take 5 years at 7% growth and if we could get to 8% growth, agreed to keep the budget at 3.73 trillion, in year five we could pay 300 billion of our national debt down. In my opinion, growth is literally the only way out of our problem without devaluing our currency. The tax raises necessary to fix our problem would choke off our ability to grow.
The new york times had a really cool flash app that let you balance the budget..<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/11/13/weekinreview/deficits-graphic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/11/13/weekinreview/d...</a><p>Here is how I did it:
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/11/13/weekinreview/deficits-graphic.html?choices=wvxj35rc" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/11/13/weekinreview/d...</a><p>It isn't easy, but getting out of Iraq and Afghanistan and letting the Bush tax cuts expire go a long way.
-Drastically cut defense spending (The cold war is over. We aren't getting into any dogfights or naval battles. Concentrate spending on urban/guerrila warfare.)
-Reform social security and medicare
-Cut where you can elsewhere
Raise taxes, quickens deflationary collapse<p>Cut spending, quickens deflationary collapse<p>Print money (QE), hyperinflationary collapse<p>"Now, America's just another broke ex-super power looking for a handout and wondering why." - Max, Dark Angel
If we only reduced spending to what it was in the year 2000, we could completely eliminate the income tax. That's how much spending has increased in the last decade.