TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Map of citation flow in science

37 点作者 lurkage将近 17 年前

5 条评论

ComputerGuru将近 17 年前
I was really surprised to see how little research is done in the CS fields until I realized something: the lines only show the quantity of citations going in and out <i>across different fields</i>.<p>They have bio and med listed separately when they're really closely tied - so they naturally have a huge amount of information exchange going on between the two, making for the seemingly-gargantuan research count/amonut for those areas.<p>In CS, on the other hand, the amount of research <i>is</i> huge (probably biggest of all since the barrier of entry is so low and isn't limited to people of that field alone); but it's mainly CS people citing other CS people's work(s). We effectively live in a bubble, albeit a very huge one. We interact and share with one another, but not that much with the rest of the industries - and we probably should, since there's a lot of ideas in cyberspace that can be mapped directly to real life.....
评论 #223923 未加载
tel将近 17 年前
If you can manage the mind-numbing, 1990s flash interface, here's another project that did a similar analysis:<p><a href="http://mapofscience.com/" rel="nofollow">http://mapofscience.com/</a><p>Their site shows a similar, higher resolution map of science and maps it to a sphere. Pretty interesting.<p>Running a literature search, Richard Klavans and Kevin Boyack published papers concerning science mapping between 2005-2006, so I imagine there was a good chance they were inspired by eigenfactor.
评论 #224097 未加载
schtog将近 17 年前
Perhaps computer science is the glue rather than the cutting edge? A lot of research is not even realistically possible without computers. Parallellisation is important for bioinformatics and so on.<p>But the really cool stuff that computers could potentially solve is incredibly hard, like machine translation and computer vision.<p>But if the singularists are right computer science will solve the problem that solves all other problems :) Or destroys us :(
ph0rque将近 17 年前
This article brings up an idea I had for a while: make a map of the sciences (and eventually of all academic disciplines) with meaningful x and y axes. My suggestion is practical vs. theoretical for one dimension, and hard vs. soft for the other. Has this been done before?
manvsmachine将近 17 年前
Reminds me of something similar that was in Seed magazine a while ago: <a href="http://seedmagazine.com/news/2007/03/scientific_method_relationship.php" rel="nofollow">http://seedmagazine.com/news/2007/03/scientific_method_relat...</a>