TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Launch HN: Flowdash (YC W20) – Human-in-the-loop tooling for operations teams

119 点作者 nickgervasi超过 5 年前
Hi everyone!<p>We’re Nick &amp; Omar from Flowdash (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;flowdash.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;flowdash.com</a>). We help companies quickly build internal tools to track and execute human-in-the-loop workflows.<p>We’re built specifically for technology companies that have manual work behind the scenes. For example, a fintech that has a beautiful mobile-first experience for its end users, likely also has a risk team internally approving new accounts, or reviewing suspicious transactions for anomalies. These teams need tools to get their jobs done, but building those tools is time consuming and often means spending your limited engineering resources on internal tools when you’d much rather invest in building user-facing features.<p>What’s more, maintenance of these tools is an ongoing endeavor. As the company scales and the operations team identifies ways they can improve their workflow, they’re often bottlenecked on engineering availability, forcing the team to implement workarounds in the interim, such as working out of spreadsheets and Slack. These workarounds, while easy to implement, come with pitfalls such as tasks slipping through the cracks or data getting out-of-sync.<p>With Flowdash, we’re combining the best of both worlds. We want to enable the deep integration that comes from building custom software, while making it possible for operations teams to iterate and improve their workflow over time. We’re able to do this because we’re not trying to be a general-purpose low-code platform, but really focus on use cases where a team of humans works through a backlog of tasks.<p>Flowdash was inspired by our own experience. Omar and I were early engineers at Gusto and over the course of six years, built several internal tools to support our payments, risk, and payroll operations teams. We saw first-hand the benefits of equipping our ops teams with great tools, but also struggled to prioritize improvements to these tools against user-facing features.<p>We think of operations teams as unsung heroes. Their work is critical to the day-to-day operations of the company, yet few people externally know they exist. We want to give them better tools to get their work done.<p>Here’s how it works:<p>Flowdash’s core primitive is a Flow, which we define as a pipeline of work, where tasks move through a set of stages from creation to completion. Every Flow exposes an endpoint where developers can push new tasks with a single POST request. Users then claim tasks and move them along the pipeline. Additionally, actions can be customized in a number of ways, such as sending email, calling a third-party API, or talking back to your main application. Because stages and actions can be customized without code, the end-user can change how they work without requiring engineering intervention. From the developer perspective, you can think of it as a human-powered background job.<p>As a concrete example, let’s consider a fintech onboarding new clients. When a new client signs up, a task is automatically pushed to Flowdash. From there, a risk agent reviews the account and decides whether to Approve or Reject the client. In turn, that action issues a callback to the main application to complete onboarding. Here’s a 3-min video setting this up end-to-end: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;flowdash.com&#x2F;demo" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;flowdash.com&#x2F;demo</a>.<p>We’re excited (and a little intimidated) to be on HN today, and would love to get your feedback. Have you had to build similar tools? What were some of the pain points or challenges? Thanks in advance!<p>Nick and Omar

15 条评论

erichocean超过 5 年前
Good idea, works really well for companies with &quot;established&quot; operations.<p>However, the missing problem we&#x27;ve found (and are investing significant resources internally to fix) is that, in a lot of situations (especially in a startup), <i>you don&#x27;t actually know what you&#x27;re doing operationally</i> at a detailed enough level to have engineers write code for, or even humans to &quot;do&quot;. <i>You&#x27;re learning as you go</i>, but still need everything in the database as you do so you <i>can</i> automate thing sooner rather than later.<p>So, automation is still required. But not yet! You need a way for humans to do things, then automation, and back again...on a &quot;flow&quot; (to use your terminology) that is radically changing as you learn.<p>In our case, new business opportunities require creating and&#x2F;or updating tens of millions of rows in our Postgres database, but can start out very small as we learn—say, 5000 independent flows.<p>Oftentimes, we need to temporarily &quot;fix&quot; things that we&#x27;ve already done a lot of work on—again, with a mix of human and compute tasks, depending on what&#x27;s going on. Those fixes are temporary and we remove them once the data in Postgres is clean.<p>Another major area is, for lack of a better term, &quot;tech onboarding&quot;. There&#x27;s a lot of work that&#x27;s effectively one-off, needs to be done at scale, and yet each day it&#x27;s something different. (Imaging ramping up some service over four weeks—a literal situation we encounter regularly.) Being able to mix human and automation there is again critical, but really no tooling that I&#x27;m aware of exists to help with.<p>Anyway…congrats on the launch. I can definitely see it working for really well-defined operation systems that just need that extra touch of automation to reduce the busy work when humans are inserted into flows.
tomashertus超过 5 年前
Congratulations on the launch. You are definitely tackling an interesting problem, but I will play a devil&#x27;s advocate here, because I&#x27;ve spent some time researching similar use-cases for dealing mainly with triage of security &amp; abuse incidents. From the demo, the application seems to be pretty basic, you accept an input and allow users to set actions, take actions, and move tasks through the tasks&#x27; life-cycle. You argue that your solution will lower the costs associated with the implementation and maintenance of such applications, but is that really the real added value of your solution for a customer?<p>In my experience, many teams have already established flows and homebrew solutions that are working &quot;just fine&quot;. With your solution in place, how do you convince these type of customers to migrate? Why they should spend time on integrating with your application that offers just fancy manual triage of tasks? You list numerous use-cases which I would say are mission critical (onboarding of customers, triage of risk transactions, etc.) and your solution doesn&#x27;t really help the operators (=humans) to resolve the problem faster. In my experience, the operators often times have to deal with so called &quot;alarm&#x2F;alert fatigue&quot;, how does your solution helps companies do more with less?
评论 #22479181 未加载
dpcheng2003超过 5 年前
Congrats on the launch guys!<p>Full disclosure, I worked with Nick and Omar at Gusto. I saw firsthand how much software can help an ops team. Since we didn&#x27;t have Flowdash at Gusto, we often scrambled for resources to empower our operations team. We also probably could&#x27;ve done a better job responding to user feedback since we were so resource constrained.<p>Having a tool that the Ops team can truly own is a game-changer for that iterative feedback loop and frees up the eng team. Really looking forward to seeing this product grow.
评论 #22477548 未加载
tekacs超过 5 年前
Congrats on the launch!<p>This reminds me of Orchestra by B12 in many ways:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;orchestra.b12.io&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;orchestra.b12.io&#x2F;</a><p>Do you have any thoughts on how you compare to that solution (besides it being OSS and yourselves a company)?
评论 #22477546 未加载
peterhunn大约 5 年前
Hi Nick and Omar - excited be this. Synergy with what I am doing at Clause. What to have a chat?
chrdlu超过 5 年前
Flowdash has really improved our workflows at my job! We use to have a very tedious human in the loop process which is now much faster and more transparent for the entire team. The main benefit has been turning excel spreadsheets into a more defined work flow with a better user interface.
Nilef超过 5 年前
Looks brilliant!! Have signed up with <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;aidem.network" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;aidem.network</a> as this is perfect for us and potential my sister company. Was going to use Orchestra by B12 but this is a much better package for us + no code
评论 #22478526 未加载
blob42超过 5 年前
How does this compare to Retool?
评论 #22478893 未加载
评论 #22478202 未加载
nexuist超过 5 年前
This is really cool. My one concern is the pricing strategy. I run a really small ridesharing business with sub 500 users, and $25&#x2F;mo is too steep for me right now. I was extremely excited to start transferring some of my flows over, but the pricing plan killed it.<p>Can you talk a bit more about your pricing strategy and how you settled on these plans? I may just not be in your target market, in which case - totally understand!
评论 #22478151 未加载
评论 #22481238 未加载
vladsanchez大约 5 年前
I may be wrong but this is a &quot;MeToo&quot; workflow automation app&#x2F;engine. It&#x27;s nothing that can&#x27;t be done with open source tools, for much less than $400&#x2F;year per user.<p>Just research &quot;Open source workflow automation engine&quot; to see it for yourself.<p>Good luck guys, WORKFLOW AUTOMATION IS A SOLVED PROBLEM!!! You&#x27;ll make a buck, it&#x27;s a big pie, but not from everyone.
评论 #22501949 未加载
theptip超过 5 年前
This is a problem that I&#x27;m facing right now, and the solution looks simple and easy to use.<p>I wonder if anyone has experience to make a comparison with more complex BPMN tools like Camunda and Zeebe? Or with Salesforce plugins like Process Builder? These came up when I looked at more established solutions for the &quot;business process automation&quot; solutions.<p>Can Flowdash handle fan-out&#x2F;parallel stages for example?
评论 #22480173 未加载
thhoward大约 5 年前
This is a very interesting solution, and is going after some of my main pain points right now (I operate within a large operationally focused org with about 20,000+ employees). I signed up for early access, would be very interesting to try out.
grandmczeb超过 5 年前
Wow, this sounds like a really cool idea! Best of luck!
frequentnapper超过 5 年前
interesting. couldn&#x27;t this just be done with a popular kanban tool like jira + Zapier?
评论 #22480144 未加载
seikij超过 5 年前
Congrats, looks really great!!