TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Official Coronavirus Numbers Are Wrong, and Everyone Knows It

39 点作者 svrma大约 5 年前

2 条评论

vanniv大约 5 年前
The only numbers anywhere in the world that are probably actually correct are from Diamond Princess. They tested everyone multiple times, and very likely detected every case eventually.<p>The Diamond Princess is an unintentional &quot;natural&quot; experiment. It is likely that the disease spread much more effectively aboard the ship than it would elsewhere in the world, but otherwise, the data should be useful.<p>Keep in mind that cruises skew older (than the overall population), even when accounting for crew -- so you might expect higher mortality than in a random sample, but it is as good of a natural experiment as we are going to get.<p>(This is relevant because older people die more often -- for example, at age 80, you have a 10% chance of death by any cause each year anyway -- and with this now being day 42 since the outbreak, that&#x27;s more than 10% of a year, so you&#x27;d expect 1% of 80-year-olds aboard to have died even without the virus for example)<p>So far, 706 cases yielded 6 deaths ruled caused by the virus, 1 death ruled unrelated to the virus, and 36 serious active cases, with 212 declared recovered to date.<p>Most of these cases are more than 21 days old now, so most of the remaining mild cases will likely be resolved soon (either by recovery or by becoming a serious case).<p>The #dead and #serious have been stable for almost a week at this point. We will see what happens, of course.
评论 #22493563 未加载
yummybear大约 5 年前
It would be interesting to randomly test, say, 500 patients with flu&#x2F;cold like symptoms to see how many are actually Corona.
评论 #22488527 未加载
评论 #22488312 未加载
评论 #22488427 未加载