TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

White House told federal health agency to classify coronavirus deliberations

275 点作者 zigzaggy大约 5 年前

15 条评论

jmull大约 5 年前
It looks like the national response to the conronavirus here in the US is going to be, &quot;Let&#x27;s hope it&#x27;s not much worse than a seasonal flu.&quot;<p>It&#x27;s really not looking good.<p>I&#x27;m still hopeful, though that&#x27;s because it&#x27;s the only thing I&#x27;ve got.
评论 #22549631 未加载
评论 #22549196 未加载
评论 #22557284 未加载
评论 #22553071 未加载
评论 #22549044 未加载
评论 #22550710 未加载
评论 #22548696 未加载
评论 #22548778 未加载
评论 #22548641 未加载
评论 #22548929 未加载
JohnFen大约 5 年前
People are already largely suspicious of the US government&#x27;s statements and responses about coronavirus. This sort of thing doesn&#x27;t exactly improve that problem.
评论 #22548133 未加载
评论 #22547974 未加载
评论 #22548325 未加载
评论 #22548990 未加载
评论 #22549562 未加载
评论 #22548116 未加载
评论 #22547939 未加载
davidw大约 5 年前
I have written off the federal government. I am writing to state and local officials here in Oregon - the mayor and state rep and state senator - to encourage them to start putting aggressive measure in place <i>now</i>.<p>Like Paul Graham just tweeted:<p>&quot;When you&#x27;re dealing with exponential growth, the time to act is when it feels too early.&quot;<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;paulg&#x2F;status&#x2F;1237801364023017472" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;paulg&#x2F;status&#x2F;1237801364023017472</a>
评论 #22549203 未加载
oneng大约 5 年前
#DontTestDontTell<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.epsilontheory.com&#x2F;dont-test-dont-tell&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.epsilontheory.com&#x2F;dont-test-dont-tell&#x2F;</a>
beart大约 5 年前
It is my understanding that there needs to be a specific reason to classify something (national security, etc.). Is that true or can the President classify anything, in the same way he can unclassify anything?
评论 #22548213 未加载
评论 #22548187 未加载
评论 #22548183 未加载
alwillis大约 5 年前
This appears to be an attempt to criminalize the dissemination of some critical healthcare information.<p>Even if state and local officials are briefed by federal officials, they may not be able to talk about what they know or face possible legal repercussions.
leptoniscool大约 5 年前
I&#x27;ve heard that the CDC has stopped collecting statistics on total tests and positive&#x2F;negative counts. Are there other government agencies collecting this data?
评论 #22549433 未加载
评论 #22551377 未加载
ceejayoz大约 5 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;julianborger&#x2F;status&#x2F;1237748572415762437" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;julianborger&#x2F;status&#x2F;1237748572415762437</a><p>&gt; Robert Redfield, CDC Director, said there are no plans to set up drive through #COVID19 test centres because &quot;We&#x27;re tryinjg to maintain the relationship between individuals and their healthcare providers.&quot;<p>Bunch of ostriches with their heads in the sand.
评论 #22548277 未加载
评论 #22548796 未加载
评论 #22548532 未加载
Simulacra大约 5 年前
I work in government relations and this is neither news, nor anything new. Deliberations at the highest level have to be confidential at times, because the players are speaking brutally honest. They need to be able to make decisions and speak their mind without the media and the public second guessing everything. Passing legislation or making policy over time is one thing, but in a crisis like this, they have to move fast. I think the last thing we want is for policymakers to have to stop and keep justifying every single thing they do, that will just lead to paralysis.
评论 #22548525 未加载
评论 #22548492 未加载
评论 #22551250 未加载
评论 #22548619 未加载
评论 #22548395 未加载
评论 #22548480 未加载
评论 #22548524 未加载
knowuh大约 5 年前
I am old enough to remember when US media was lobbing criticism at China for downplaying the threat to the public.<p>We are what we think China is.
评论 #22548316 未加载
评论 #22549511 未加载
评论 #22549600 未加载
评论 #22549876 未加载
评论 #22548230 未加载
评论 #22548242 未加载
评论 #22549458 未加载
tectonic大约 5 年前
Not great, not terrible.
cletus大约 5 年前
US corporate culture is primarily one of absolute loyalism. Absolute loyalty is demanded and expected all the way up the management chain and it trumps (no pun intended) all else, including job competence. What some Americans may not realize is that this isn&#x27;t universally true globally.<p>What we have now is a president who comes from and exemplifies this culture so his administration absolutely reflects that. Jeff Sessions recusing himself on the Russia investigation instead of blocking it even if it cost him everything, personally, was an unforgivable sin to an absolute loyalist.<p>So I guarantee you that the prime consideration for this pandemic (which it now officially is, according to the WHO) in the US government is how this impacts the GOP in general and Trump&#x27;s reelection in particular. Nothing else matters.<p>Go back to, say, the Watergate era and you had behaviour by a president that even his own party ultimately found unacceptable. If Watergate repeated today, it would be &quot;fake news&quot;, painted as partisan Democratic slander aimed at the administration and defended beyond all reason.<p>The sad and scary part of this is that we now have 40% of the population who will absolutely eat this up and refuse to believe anything that makes the president look bad. To be fair, there are absolute devotees on the other side too but objectively we&#x27;ve seen nothing to the degree of GOP blind loyalism on from the Democrats (yet).<p>There was a time when our representatives held higher loyalties to the institutions they represent because undermining those is incredibly dangerous. Those days seem to be a distant memory as we have a mass organized effort to disenfranchise those who tend to vote Democrat (under the guise of removing &quot;felons&quot; from voter rolls), a refusal by the Senate to take up legislation that would pass at a completely unprecedented rate, a Senate whose only priority is filling lifetime judicial nominees with more loyalists and the refusal to even take up a president&#x27;s Supreme Court nominee with flimsily-constructed justification you know for a fact wouldn&#x27;t apply if the situation was reversed.<p>This is the trait of dictators and despots. Why do you think Trump admires Putin, Xi Jinping and Kim Jong-Un?<p>So yes, it should come as no surprise that the planning, messaging and response to this pandemic is being seen through the exact same filter: how does this help or hurt Trump?<p>And it will kill people. I don&#x27;t wish ill on anyone here but it&#x27;s hard not to see the irony that the most at-risk groups of death from Covid-19 are, well, Trump&#x27;s core voters and Fox News&#x27;s core target market for fearmongering and dog-whistle racism.<p>Classifying public health responses is unprecedented. Yet as long as Trump&#x27;s base (40% of voters) don&#x27;t hold the government to account absolutely nothing will change. And the only time that&#x27;s happened that I recall is the family separation for detained illegal immigrants. Has there been any other reversal of policy like this?
评论 #22549292 未加载
chvid大约 5 年前
My interpretation is that the Trump administration maximized the effect the virus outbreak had in a trade and propaganda war against China but in return sacrificed America&#x27;s internal preparation for a potential outbreak.
thoraway1010大约 5 年前
No surprise. We had Larry Kudlow saying a week or two ago that the virus was &quot;fully contained&quot; in the US. [1]<p>We had the CDC take down the number of folks tested from their website because it was embarrassingly low and different then the Pence &#x2F; Trump narrative of a million tests. [2]<p>We&#x27;ve had a weird &#x2F; crazy argument being made by at least some at the top that masks don&#x27;t help with transmission reduction of a viral disease. While not perfect, they are low cost, low impact and even surgical masks, while likely not used by doctors treating patients may help general population by reducing hand to mouth &#x2F; nose transmission, transmission from sick to healthy and environment when sneezing and&#x2F;or touching face mouth and then environment etc. Other countries are going the other way (masks distributed via post offices, mask wearing mandatory in high impact areas etc).<p>[1] - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnbc.com&#x2F;2020&#x2F;02&#x2F;25&#x2F;larry-kudlow-says-us-has-contained-the-coronavirus-and-the-economy-is-holding-up-nicely.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnbc.com&#x2F;2020&#x2F;02&#x2F;25&#x2F;larry-kudlow-says-us-has-con...</a><p>[2] - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;JuddLegum&#x2F;status&#x2F;1234536619270688768" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;JuddLegum&#x2F;status&#x2F;1234536619270688768</a><p>[3] - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov&#x2F;pmc&#x2F;articles&#x2F;PMC2662657&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov&#x2F;pmc&#x2F;articles&#x2F;PMC2662657&#x2F;</a> - Adherence to mask use was associated with a significantly reduced risk of ILI-associated infection.
评论 #22549255 未加载
评论 #22548785 未加载
gentleman11大约 5 年前
&gt; Staffers without security clearances, including government experts, were excluded from the interagency meetings<p>&gt; “We had some very critical people who did not have security clearances who could not go,”<p>So... is there any justification for this? It sounds entirely political