TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

China Bans Americans Working for WSJ, NYT, WaPo

298 点作者 big_chungus大约 5 年前

25 条评论

dang大约 5 年前
All: This thread is terrible and violates the spirit of this site in too many ways to list. HN is not a place for nationalistic flamewar or accusing each other. Please don&#x27;t do that damage here. The container is fragile.<p>If this epidemic continues, we&#x27;re going to do less &quot;please don&#x27;t&quot; and more &quot;we&#x27;ve banned&quot;. I don&#x27;t mean the coronavirus— I mean the epidemic of violating HN&#x27;s guidelines. Please review <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;newsguidelines.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;newsguidelines.html</a> and stick to the rules when posting here.<p>The vast majority of the community come here for curious conversation, not to hear people bashing each other and their countries in the same few ways over and over again. That&#x27;s not only nasty, it&#x27;s tedious. Please take it elsewhere.<p>More explanation in this thread: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=22605365" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=22605365</a>
评论 #22611809 未加载
koboll大约 5 年前
I truly don&#x27;t understand why &quot;expel Chinese journalists&quot; was even considered as a reasonable course of action by the US.<p>It may not explicitly violate the letter of the 1st Amendment, but it certainly violates its spirit, not to mention invites reciprocal action like this that only deepens the fog of war over our most dangerous adversary power.<p>There are many, many legitimate ways to punish foreign governments, but the expulsion of reporters should never be among them, unless we are at war with that government.<p>&quot;But China did it first!&quot; Well, then we should highlight how outrageous and unacceptable that behavior is, and sanction them some other way. Not reciprocate.
评论 #22611744 未加载
评论 #22608824 未加载
评论 #22607799 未加载
评论 #22607821 未加载
评论 #22607661 未加载
Leary大约 5 年前
America will surely retaliate.<p>Here&#x27;s a timeline for those who haven&#x27;t followed this:<p>Feb 3rd: WSJ publishes opinion piece titled &quot;China Is the Real Sick Man of Asia&quot;<p>Feb 19th: China expels three China-based WSJ reporters<p>March 2nd: America limits journalists from Chinese state media from 160 to 100
评论 #22607522 未加载
评论 #22607960 未加载
评论 #22611176 未加载
评论 #22607974 未加载
评论 #22607520 未加载
dmix大约 5 年前
Aw, WSJ videos covering China were some of my favourite content. China is really lashing out.<p>Nothing is surprising since they banned Zedd from China simply for liking a South Park tweet, he&#x27;s a very popular (and harmlessly generic) pop musician:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;Zedd&#x2F;status&#x2F;1182376966495838208" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;Zedd&#x2F;status&#x2F;1182376966495838208</a>
reaperducer大约 5 年前
For thousands of years, tyrants and small-minded people have always tried to shoot the messenger. It seldom stops the message.
评论 #22607735 未加载
评论 #22607524 未加载
评论 #22607650 未加载
sub7大约 5 年前
The US and China are at war. The last Cold War kind of gave us the internet so hopefully we fund some big ambitious tech this time too.
评论 #22607953 未加载
评论 #22607995 未加载
评论 #22610443 未加载
vincvinc大约 5 年前
This is a big hit for journalism about China. A lot of very good quality reporting on (among others) Xinjiang came from these people. We will all be much less informed about China in the future.<p>The subtle shift in confidence that this action implies is that China is confident in itself after &quot;beating&quot; the virus while the west is struggling.<p>A &quot;media war&quot; between China and the US might be worse than a trade war. While a trade war is just about numbers, this will be about ideology and there will be no middle ground.
mengibar10大约 5 年前
There&#x27;s growing resentment against Western media for the way the news reported. Take a look at following links. I saw one of them personally on NYTimes couple of days ago. The one from CNN below the banner reads &quot;California prisons&quot; but the picture is from a mosque in Istanbul. One incident is a mistake, but multiple times same &quot;mistake&quot; only show malevolence.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FES7n-NcWkAMqaO1.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fcnn%2Fstatus%2F1237986945424334848&amp;tbnid=6WOnxz6YnBrtJM&amp;vet=12ahUKEwji1IDMjaLoAhUJz6wKHXyEBJcQMygBegUIARDzAQ..i&amp;docid=8MWg45kUmJxQrM&amp;w=720&amp;h=960&amp;itg=1&amp;q=cnn%20prisons%20in%20california%20are%20suspending&amp;ved=2ahUKEwji1IDMjaLoAhUJz6wKHXyEBJcQMygBegUIARDzAQ" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg...</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;img.piri.net&#x2F;mnresize&#x2F;840&#x2F;-&#x2F;resim&#x2F;imagecrop&#x2F;2020&#x2F;03&#x2F;17&#x2F;09&#x2F;52&#x2F;resized_31609-e8c09d93mansetkapak.jpg" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;img.piri.net&#x2F;mnresize&#x2F;840&#x2F;-&#x2F;resim&#x2F;imagecrop&#x2F;2020&#x2F;03&#x2F;...</a>
评论 #22609213 未加载
评论 #22608242 未加载
mac01021大约 5 年前
&quot;... whose press credentials end in 2020&quot; is a significant part of the headline missing from the HN title.
评论 #22608905 未加载
predictmktegirl大约 5 年前
It&#x27;s difficult to have compassion and empathy without discussion. These sorts of maneuvers tend to have horrifying butterfly effects.
xster大约 5 年前
I&#x27;m surprised they didn&#x27;t start with outlawing receiving money from NED or subsidiaries first.
markmiro大约 5 年前
This signals to me that the outlets are good sources of information
评论 #22608938 未加载
评论 #22608110 未加载
seanmcdirmid大约 5 年前
Note that they are also banning from working in Hong Kong and Macau.
gwd大约 5 年前
Can&#x27;t read the article behind a paywall, but this is China&#x27;s side of the story:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.fmprc.gov.cn&#x2F;mfa_eng&#x2F;xwfw_665399&#x2F;s2510_665401&#x2F;t1757162.shtml" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.fmprc.gov.cn&#x2F;mfa_eng&#x2F;xwfw_665399&#x2F;s2510_665401&#x2F;t1...</a><p>Seems this is part of an ongoing diplomatic spat.<p>EDIT: FYI, couldn&#x27;t read the article due to a paywall, did a search, found out some about the history. Thought this added information to the conversation. Yes, this is clearly propaganda, but I still thought it was interesting. You&#x27;re all of age, you can read this sort of propaganda without being harmed.
评论 #22607941 未加载
coliveira大约 5 年前
This is an information war. The US is also banning Chinese journalists. In the end, everybody is losing and I don&#x27;t see anyone here doing the right thing.
api大约 5 年前
I wonder if they&#x27;re under-reporting their COVID-19 numbers to win propaganda points.<p>Naaaaah... impossible.
评论 #22608016 未加载
adultSwim大约 5 年前
I can&#x27;t blame them..
JungleGymSam大约 5 年前
China sucks.
bitxbit大约 5 年前
China is going to face a deep recession as corporations rethink supply chain. The communist party needs something to blame and US is a perfect target.
datashow2大约 5 年前
@dang, please ban all accounts involved in this thread.
评论 #22608418 未加载
mjevans大约 5 年前
Paywall
评论 #22608524 未加载
friedman23大约 5 年前
What a coincidence, I&#x27;m subscribed to most of those!
onetimemanytime大约 5 年前
It&#x27;s war (of words) The Chinese Virus vs US bioweapon. Plus China might be hiding something
评论 #22607860 未加载
resters大约 5 年前
Don&#x27;t forget that the US Government has sought to pursue charges against journalists under the espionage act for reporting on government misconduct, and that America&#x27;s great firewall (Facebook) started suppressing RT after the 2016 election. Also, Al Jazeera is not carried by most US cable providers.
评论 #22608605 未加载
spectramax大约 5 年前
People on HN engaging in whatboutism - can you please find a single article from the CCP state media that criticizes the CCP? I could literally go on WSJ&#x2F;NYT&#x2F;WaPo <i>right now</i> and find many articles criticizing US government.<p>That&#x27;s what <i>free press</i> means. China has no tolerance for truth if it collides with the CCP image.
评论 #22611461 未加载