TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

I'm calling Bullshit on Medtronic's Open Sourcing of a ventilator design

73 点作者 bhc大约 5 年前

6 条评论

karthikb大约 5 年前
Not only are the files incomplete to actually go into production, they’ve picked a model where the components are not readily available on the open market in quantities large enough to have an impact corresponding to effort. IC4 is some variant of the ST10F27 (can’t make out the last digit from the low res pdf they’ve provided), and there are only a few thousand of <i>all variants</i> of that chip available online with quotes lead times of up to 30 weeks.<p>I was initially pleasantly surprised with this release but tweeted my disappointment pretty quickly. Even with a schematic it can take months to get the layout right and validated on a line, build and setup the test apparatus...
评论 #22743304 未加载
评论 #22735325 未加载
devy大约 5 年前
More dirt of Medtronic:<p>- In May 2018, Medtronic was ranked as the largest corporate tax inversion in history. [1]<p>- Medtronic weaseled their way out of creating affordable ventilators for the US government.[2]<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theglobeandmail.com&#x2F;globe-investor&#x2F;investment-ideas&#x2F;the-worlds-biggest-inversion-is-boring-investors&#x2F;article29605267&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theglobeandmail.com&#x2F;globe-investor&#x2F;investment-id...</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2020&#x2F;03&#x2F;29&#x2F;business&#x2F;coronavirus-us-ventilator-shortage.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2020&#x2F;03&#x2F;29&#x2F;business&#x2F;coronavirus-us-v...</a>
评论 #22735374 未加载
jdkee大约 5 年前
Nationalize this IP and require the IP to be open source. Figure out the payments afterwards.
评论 #22734994 未加载
评论 #22735036 未加载
jacquesm大约 5 年前
Medtronic&#x27;s slogan ought to be &#x27;yesterday&#x27;s tech for tomorrows prices&#x27;.
评论 #22735409 未加载
评论 #22735382 未加载
ryanobjc大约 5 年前
This looks like the kind of documentation that all end users would get. Enough to do PM maybe, enough to operate it, enough to satisfy regulatory requirements (eg: prove how the tech was tested, what those procedures were, controls on the docs, etc).<p>There is no way to manufacture one from this set of docs.
newyankee大约 5 年前
I wonder if there is a project where a cheaper hospital for a third world country can be created by using tech which is old but not covered under current IP (expired patents).<p>I mean i believe stuff like MRI cannot be manufactured by non large manufacturers but what about all other machines.<p>My guess is the bottleneck would be no one except current manufacturers make it at scale to do it cheap enough. It would be a great project to have though.<p>When i look at the prices of certain devices it just boggles my mind. It is crazier when one realizes that some of these are not even patent protected.
评论 #22734995 未加载
评论 #22735312 未加载
评论 #22735404 未加载
评论 #22735196 未加载