TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Rust docs team is no more

141 点作者 garyng大约 5 年前

13 条评论

Traster大约 5 年前
That feeling when you're done with writing documentation but you just can't shake the impulse to document that fact.
评论 #22769935 未加载
评论 #22770499 未加载
Townley大约 5 年前
To get good documentation, you can either take a documentation expert (they exist and they&#x27;re worth their weight in gold) and teach them the relevant part of the code base, or take the code author and teach them to write good docs. In my opinion, the second approach is best because the code author has the nuanced familiarity necessary to provide high-level context to an end-user.<p>This switch by Rust seems in line with that thinking. The Rust community, through no accidents, has incredible standards when it comes to documentation. Now that the feature teams have learned to write docs that live up to that standard (a skill as valuable as writing tests IMO) it makes sense for them to do so.
评论 #22770989 未加载
评论 #22772320 未加载
评论 #22770364 未加载
评论 #22770336 未加载
pornel大约 5 年前
The headline sounds scary, but the actual change sounds like it&#x27;s merely an organizational reshuffling formality.
评论 #22770199 未加载
hu3大约 5 年前
Begs the question: Why isn&#x27;t Mozilla funding this?<p>&gt; At this point, the only person really writing docs is me, and I haven&#x27;t had a ton of time lately either. So we haven&#x27;t had a docs team meeting since August of 2018. There also aren&#x27;t really docs RFCs these days. As such, this blog post isn&#x27;t really announcing the end of the docs team as much as it is describing what is already true today.
评论 #22769498 未加载
评论 #22771205 未加载
评论 #22772871 未加载
hereisdx大约 5 年前
Rust is an amazing language, and I&#x27;m glad to see they are transparent too.
mikece大约 5 年前
An example of a project that is &quot;done?&quot;
评论 #22769357 未加载
评论 #22769912 未加载
评论 #22770043 未加载
评论 #22769937 未加载
shadowgovt大约 5 年前
Good work, docs team.
calibas大约 5 年前
Sounds like a situation I&#x27;ve found myself in before. The majority of the work is done, and it&#x27;s become more work to organize and maintain a team than to simply do it on your own.
weinzierl大约 5 年前
The Rust documentation was not the reason I started with Rust but it was an important reason why I stuck with it and it was what helped me over the initial bump. The chapter about ownership and borrowing in the Rust Book was particularly helpful and it was nice to see it evolve and improve over time.
prike大约 5 年前
Respect to the Rust docs team.<p>Unfortunately, the rust std docs are not my favourite. I think i&#x27;m much more comfortable in other&#x27;s languages docs. I really like the examples, like in c++.<p>Maybe I just don&#x27;t know hot to use them.
mfer大约 5 年前
&amp;tldr; The docs team created filled in the gaps where they were needed when it was created. Now, the teams making the code changes handle their own docs and doc changes. There is no longer a need for a docs only team.<p>So, instead of having a dedicated team for docs the load has shifted to the teams responsible for the code. Sounds like a reorg more than anything.
评论 #22769846 未加载
adrianhel大约 5 年前
Good strategy. By ensuring good documentation in the early stages, the community will likely follow.
throwawaysea大约 5 年前
I&#x27;m not deeply familiar with how Rust is organized, but have found their documentation to be useful when dabbling with it. Will they continue updating docs at the same fidelity after this change?
评论 #22771444 未加载